Extracting mechanical properties from strain-stress plot (real test)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on extracting mechanical properties from a stress-strain plot for a 306LN stainless steel sample using the Ramberg-Osgood equation. The reported Young's modulus of 187 GPa from the lab contrasts sharply with the calculated value of 19.2 GPa based on the tensile test results. The yield strength and tensile ultimate strength values align closely with lab results, but the elongation percentage is also questioned. The discrepancy in Young's modulus suggests a potential error in the lab's reporting or a misunderstanding of the strain values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elasto-plastic modeling
  • Familiarity with the Ramberg-Osgood equation
  • Knowledge of tensile testing procedures
  • Basic principles of stress-strain analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Ramberg-Osgood equation and its applications in material science
  • Learn about tensile testing standards for stainless steel, specifically 306LN
  • Investigate common errors in calculating Young's modulus from stress-strain data
  • Explore the significance of strain values in material property determination
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, mechanical engineers, and researchers involved in mechanical property testing and analysis of metals, particularly those working with stainless steel and elasto-plastic models.

freddie_mclair
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
Hi everyone, recently I was working out an elasto-plastic model to make some residual stress predictions: see it here.
Recently I got some real tensile tests results from a lab, therefore I would like to extract a better stress-strain curve to plug into my elasto-plastic model using the Ramberg-Osgood equation. The problem is that I cannot get the Young's modulus that they claim to have obtained!

Here's the tensile test plot:
Tensile-test.jpg


The stress-strain curve I would like to extract corresponds to the plots on the bottom part of the image (ultimate stress around 7.5kN).
The geometry of the samples is the following:
Sample-dimensions.jpg


The results reported by the lab are the following:
  • ##\mbox{- Yield strength: } S_y=480\mbox{ MPa}##
    • from the plot we get ##6{kN}/(\pi 2^2)=477.5\mbox{ MPa}##. OK here!
  • ##\mbox{- Tensile ultimate strength: } S_u=615\mbox{ MPa}##
    • from the plot we get around ##7.5{kN}/(\pi 2^2)=597\mbox{ MPa}##. OK here too!
  • ##\mbox{- Elongation: } 54\%##
    • from the plot, we see that it has been elongated up to around 12mm, which, if we consider the length of the sample to be 24mm, it corresponds to these 50%. Also fine!
  • ##\mbox{- Young's modulus: } E=187\mbox{ GPa}##
    • I unable to get this result... from the plot, the displacement corresponding to the Yield strength (##@6\mbox{ kN}##), ##S_y=480\mbox{ MPa}## is around 0.6mm, which then leads to a strain of ##(24.6-24)/24=0.025##. Consequentially, this gives me an order of magnitude lower for Young's modulus: ##480/0.025=19.2\cdot10^3\mbox{ MPa}##, i.e., ##19.2\mbox{ GPa}##.
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Where did the 187 come from?
 
Chestermiller said:
Where did the 187 come from?
This is the value declared from the lab report (it's not mentioned how it was calculated).
I was just trying to calculate it (and cross-check it) by myself based on the plot results.

Ah, this is a 306LN stainless steel.
 
Maybe there's a typo, and a decimal point was omitted?
 
No, for sure that it is not a typo. Also, for stainless steel, 190GPa are the "normal" values... I just don't get what is happening in the elastic part of this Load VS Displacement plot.

They have done other tensile tests on similar samples, and the values are also similar.
 
Typical strain values for steel at yield might be in the order of
0.002 rather than .025. Something funny with the decimal point here. Factor of 10. Something is amiss.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K