Understanding $\mathbb{K}$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$ - Get Your Answers Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hernaner28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt
AI Thread Summary
The symbol $\mathbb{K}$ typically represents an arbitrary field, which should be explicitly defined in context. In contrast, $\mathbb{R}^n$ denotes n-dimensional real space, essentially the unique n-dimensional vector space over the real numbers. There is a distinction between referring to $\mathbb{R}^n$ simply as a set of ordered n-tuples of real numbers and considering it as a vector space with operations defined coordinate-wise. While many discussions assume the vector space structure, it's important to clarify the context to avoid confusion. Overall, understanding these symbols requires attention to their definitions and the structures implied in various mathematical contexts.
Hernaner28
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
Hi. What does that mean when we see:

$$\mathbb{K}$$ what set is that? definitely not the reals, integers, etc.
and
$$\mathbb{R}^n$$ Is that the reals or what?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the blackboard K is often used to refer to an arbitrary field. If you encounter it somewhere it should be stated what is meant by it.

The blackboard R^n just means n-dimensional real space. So basically (up to linear isomorphism) the unique n-dimensional vector space over the real numbers.
 
Thank you!
 
conquest said:
the blackboard K is often used to refer to an arbitrary field. If you encounter it somewhere it should be stated what is meant by it.

The blackboard R^n just means n-dimensional real space. So basically (up to linear isomorphism) the unique n-dimensional vector space over the real numbers.
A tiny disagreement. R^n is the set of order n-tuples of real numbers. It becomes a vector space only with the convention that "sum" and "scalar multiplication" are "coordinate wise". Yes, that is the "natural" convention but it separate from just "R^n".
 
You are right of course. Naturally my response was in terms of the vector space since this is the first definition I saw. You could also assume this and express that you are only talking strictly as the n-tuples of real numbers by mentioning you use the bare set underlying the vector space. I think in most literature the vector space (indeed also the natural topological, norm, inner product, Lie group and manifold (symplectic, smooth, Riemannian)) structure are assumed when used. A thing that might be stated explicitely is any algebra structure.

So immediately when I see that symbol these things I also assume, but it might pay to be a bit more reserved about this.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top