Extremely low frequency—antenna

  • Thread starter Thread starter ws0619
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of designing an antenna for a small satellite intended to measure extremely low frequency (ELF) signals from an altitude of 1 km. Participants explore various antenna designs and their feasibility given the size constraints of the satellite.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) seeks suggestions for an antenna that can fit inside a can-sized satellite to measure ELF signals, noting that typical antennas are too large.
  • One participant suggests using a bundle of ferrite rods.
  • Another participant mentions that a half-wave dipole for 100 KHz would be about 1500 meters long, indicating that a less efficient antenna might be necessary.
  • There is a proposal to use a long wire antenna that could be deployed from the satellite, possibly using a motor to unwind it once in orbit.
  • Some participants question the feasibility of the satellite being at only 1 km altitude, suggesting it may be a low-altitude payload rather than in orbit.
  • Concerns are raised about regulatory issues with the FAA regarding a long wire antenna at 1000 m altitude.
  • One participant suggests that a loop of wire on a ferrite rod might work, but another counters that ferrite rods are poor antennas unless used with high power broadcasts.
  • There is discussion about the need for a significant length of wire for effective reception at low frequencies, with suggestions that a hot air balloon might help elevate the antenna.
  • The OP expresses concerns about the practicality of using wire antennas due to size constraints and seeks alternatives, mentioning that a loop antenna is still too large.
  • Another participant suggests using an iron core with many turns of wire around it for better reception.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of using ferrite or powdered iron to minimize eddy losses, with some participants suggesting that solid iron would not be suitable.
  • The OP considers coiling wire around the satellite's outer layer as a potential solution and questions if this would be effective.
  • One participant proposes an alternative method of trailing a wire behind a small aircraft to conduct the experiment, while the OP clarifies their intention to use a rocket or balloon to reach altitude.
  • There is a mention of the possibility of listening for whistlers and experimenting with a balloon holding the wire vertically from the ground.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best approach to designing an antenna for the specified conditions, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the most suitable solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the size of the antenna, the altitude of the satellite, and the regulatory implications of deploying antennas at low altitudes. There are also unresolved questions about the effectiveness of various proposed antenna designs at ELF frequencies.

ws0619
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I would like to do an experiment by using a can size satellite(at 1km high from earth) to sense the extremely low frequency(elf) and measure the characteristic of this elf.
So, I am searching for a suitable antenna to fix inside my can size satellite. But result is the antenna is extremely large as compared to my can size satellite.
Any suggestion about the antenna? Or how to create a suitable antenna for this situation?
I try to use loop antenna, but seem that it still larger than a can size.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Bundle of ferrite rods.
 
A half wave dipole for 100 KHz would have a length of about 1500 metres or a bit less than a mile.
That would be about the smallest efficient antenna you could use.

You can't use quarter wave antennas, because you can't make an Earth connection.

So, some less efficient antenna could be considered. A length of wire as long as possible could be launched from the satellite and the results can just be accepted.

Something like the metal tape in tape measures could be used as an antenna. In a weightless environment, this would probably be strong enough. It could be wound out of the satellite by a motor, once it was in orbit.
 
The OP said the "satellite" was only going to be 1km high ("in orbit"...), so either that was a typo, or it is a low-altitude launched payload.

But you bring up an interesting idea, vk6kro, maybe a long wire antenna either trailed by the can, or maybe even with a balloon on the end of it or something.

ws0619 -- can your can/satellite trail a long wire?
 
What is the source of the ELF, the earth, the atmosphere or something else?

Would the FAA have anything to say about dangling a long wire antenna from 1000 m?
 
skeptic2 said:
Would the FAA have anything to say about dangling a long wire antenna from 1000 m?

Whoopsies. Very good point!
 
Wouldn't a loop of wire on a ferrite rod work well its what they use for AM radio,
you would need a much longer wire though, with any telescopic antenna.
 
Ferrite rods actually make very poor antennas but the radios that use them get away with it because broadcast stations use lots of power.

For effective reception at frequencies below 100 KHz, the ideal antenna is a dipole or, failing that, as much wire in the air as possible. At least the elevated location should help reception.

If the poster had the means to put the satellite a bit higher, maybe 100 KM, it might be possible to use such long wire antennas. Anything that can fit inside the satellite might not work very well at low frequencies.
At 1 KM perhaps a hot air balloon with 20 metres of wire below it might be OK.
 
I think wire is not suitable for my can size satellite, because I need to BUILD IN the antenna in the can.
For the (elf),I need to sense from the atmosphere like magnetic wave which produce by earth.But the main thing is I need to do this research on a particular area(1km from earth) to sense any (elf) in that area.And analysis out the characteristic of the (elf).
Thanks for you all to reply!I try to ask my University lecturer on this antenna, my lecturer said loop antenna is more suitable, but by using loop antenna calculator, the loop antenna still larger than the can size.
 
  • #10
  • #11
Has to be ferrite or powdered iron otherwise eddy loses are high. And it can't be a metal can.
 
  • #12
Pumblechook said:
Has to be ferrite or powdered iron otherwise eddy loses are high. And it can't be a metal can.

Though he hasn't given the frequency, I was thinking it might be as low as a few tens of Hz. Ferrite or powdered iron wouldn't be needed at those frequencies.
 
  • #13
You can't use solid iron even at mains frequency. It would have to be laminations then as per the common transformer.
 
  • #14
ws0619 said:
I think wire is not suitable for my can size satellite, because I need to BUILD IN the antenna in the can.
For the (elf),I need to sense from the atmosphere like magnetic wave which produce by earth.But the main thing is I need to do this research on a particular area(1km from earth) to sense any (elf) in that area.And analysis out the characteristic of the (elf).
Thanks for you all to reply!I try to ask my University lecturer on this antenna, my lecturer said loop antenna is more suitable, but by using loop antenna calculator, the loop antenna still larger than the can size.

If you really want to do this experiment 1km high, the most appropriate method would be to trail a wire behind a small aircraft, and shut off the engine for the duration of the measurement (glide for a minute or two). The requirement of a can-size object and your frequency range are not very compatible, and at best you will have a very poor S/N ratio in your measurements (and hence, may not get any useful data at all).
 
  • #15
berkeman said:
If you really want to do this experiment 1km high, the most appropriate method would be to trail a wire behind a small aircraft, and shut off the engine for the duration of the measurement (glide for a minute or two). The requirement of a can-size object and your frequency range are not very compatible, and at best you will have a very poor S/N ratio in your measurements (and hence, may not get any useful data at all).

Thanks for your advice.I get your point.

I am not using a small aircraft.How I will do it is like I will use a can size satellite and launch it by maybe using small rocket or balloon to reach 1km high then let off the can size satellite.During the comeback process, It support by para foil.If I use your way by trailing a wire behind, I think during the falling the wire won't be a straight line, and it will become helical.So, can this wire act as antenna?I was thinking of coiling the wire around the outer layer of the can size satellite,can this actually work?
 
  • #16
Are you listening for Whistlers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistler_(radio )

If you have access to a balloon, maybe you could turn the experiment upside down and try it from the ground with the balloon holding your wire vertical for you. Then you would be able to see how sensitive your equipment needs to be before you commit to more expensive techniques.

1000 cu ft of Hydrogen will lift 70 lbs
1000 cu ft of Helium will lift 65 lbs
1000 cu ft of hot air at 212 deg F will lift 17 lbs

1000 cu ft is a spherical shape 6.2 ft in radius or 12.4 ft in diameter. That is a big balloon.

The antenna would be ineffective if you coil it up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K