1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

[f(x)'^n continuous at a point (EXAM IN 4 hrs.)

  1. Dec 14, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Suppose f: D-->R is continuous at a. Let n >1 be a positive integer. using the epsilon-delta definition of continuity, prove g(x)=[f(x)]^n is continuous as a


    2. Relevant equations
    i know how to do it as a sequence proof; but i don't know how to use the epislon/delta definition to prove it.


    3. The attempt at a solution
    i tried using the composition proof too, but that didn't work. any help?
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 14, 2009 #2
    Um, I'm assuming you mean g = f nested n times since you mentioned the "composition proof". If this is the case, I don't even think the theorem is true since if n = 2, you would need f to be continuous at f(a), but f(a) might not even be in D.
     
  4. Dec 14, 2009 #3
    the problem states:
    suppose f:D--> R is continuous at a. Let n >1 be a positive integer. Using the epsilon and delta definition of continuity, prove g(x)=[f(x)]^n is continuous at a.

    Does that help?

    Also, the composition way did not work. which is why i'm unsure of how to go about tackling the problem.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  5. Dec 14, 2009 #4
    Sorry, the comment about the composition of functions threw me off. I should have known that the solvable interpretation is the right one.

    Anyways, you need to estimate |[f(x)]^n - [f(a)]^n| knowing that you can bind |f(x) - f(a)| by any positive number. But a^n - b^n has a very nice and symmetric formal factorization, namely

    [tex]a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1} + a^{n-2}b + ... + b^{n-2}a + b^{n-1})[/tex]

    Thus you can replace a with f(x) and b with f(a) to get |[f(x)]^n - [f(a)]^n| equal to |f(x) - f(a)| times a bunch of terms within an absolute value (this is key) as a result of the factorization above. But now can you see what to bind |f(x) - f(a)| by to ensure that |[f(x)]^n - [f(a)]^n| is less than say, epsilon?
     
  6. Dec 14, 2009 #5
    So i wrote,
    We know that f is continuous at a. to prove that g is continuous at a:
    let epsilon be greater than 0 and let delta > 0 such that d=epsilon/[tex](f(x)^{n-1} + f(x)^{n-2}f(a) + ... + f(a)^{n-2}f(x) + f(a)^{n-1})[/tex]

    then,
    for |x-a| < delta, then |f(x)^n-f(a)^n|=[tex]f(x)^n - f(a)^n = (f(x)-f(a))(f(x)^{n-1} + f(x)^{n-2}f(a) + ... + f(a)^{n-2}f(x) + f(a)^{n-1})[/tex]
    < (f(x)-f(a)) * delta = epsilon. So g is continuous at a.

    Is that what you meant?
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  7. Dec 14, 2009 #6
    You have the right idea, but you don't actually get to choose delta here. Since f is continuous at a, there is already some delta for which |x-a| < delta implies
    [tex]|f(x) - f(a)| < \frac{\varepsilon}{(f(x)^{n-1} + f(x)^{n-2}f(a) + ... + f(a)^{n-2}f(x) + f(a)^{n-1})}.[/tex]

    But this is exactly what we need.
     
  8. Dec 14, 2009 #7
     
  9. Dec 15, 2009 #8
    Eh, perhaps it would be clearer if I just pieced together the proof. Let epsilon > 0 be given. By the continuity of f at a, there exists some delta > 0 such that |x-a| < delta implies
    [tex]
    |f(x) - f(a)| < \frac{\varepsilon}{|f(x)^{n-1} + f(x)^{n-2}f(a) + ... + f(a)^{n-2}f(x) + f(a)^{n-1}|}.
    [/tex]
    But then
    [tex]
    |f(x)^n - f(a)^n| = |f(x)-f(a)||f(x)^{n-1} + f(x)^{n-2}f(a) + ... + f(a)^{n-2}f(x) + f(a)^{n-1}| < \varepsilon.
    [/tex]
     
  10. Dec 15, 2009 #9
    oh that makes sense. thank you so much! =)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?