How about: Can realistic boundary conditions cure the Casimir energy divergence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter selfAdjoint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
6,843
Reaction score
11
This new research paper shows that more realistic boundary conditions on the Casimir energy calculation can lead it to diverge in the neighborhood of the plates. Obvious applications to sf devices are left as an excercise
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Very interesting.

Does this still square with the "quantum inequalities" on negative energy densities?
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
This new research paper shows that more realistic boundary conditions on the Casimir energy calculation can lead it to diverge...

You got it backwards: Realistic BCs are the cure, as one would expect. Here are the final two sentences in the abstract:

"This result implies that the energy depends in detail on the properties of the material, which are not captured by the idealized boundary conditions. This divergence...does invalidate calculations of Casimir stresses based on idealized boundary conditions."
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top