Factor of friction strange behavior

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the coefficient of friction (μ) between Steel-Brass and Steel-Aluminum surfaces under varying applied forces. For Steel-Brass, μ decreases as the applied force increases, while for Steel-Aluminum, μ increases with the applied force. The experimental setup involves a steel rotation disk, aluminum and brass rods, and pressures of 1, 2, and 3 bars, resulting in forces of approximately 106 N, 212 N, and 318 N. The coefficient of friction is calculated using the formula μ=T/(2*F), where T is the friction force and F is the applied force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of friction and its measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with experimental setups involving rotating disks
  • Knowledge of pressure units and their conversion to force
  • Proficiency in using electronic devices for measuring friction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of surface roughness on friction coefficients
  • Explore the relationship between applied pressure and friction in different material pairings
  • Study the principles of tribology and its applications in material science
  • Investigate advanced friction measurement techniques and devices
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, mechanical engineers, and researchers studying friction in metal interactions will benefit from this discussion.

Achileas7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I have a really interesting question here. I am measuring the factor of friction between two different metals. My results are a beat cloudy. When I use Steel - Brass surfaces the factor of friction, μ is being reduced while I am increasing the applied force. In other side, when I use Steel - Aluminum surfaces, when I am increasing the applied force on the two materials the factor of friction, μ goes up. Anyone can explain what is happening? There is no measurement mistake, that' s guaranteed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Achileas7 said:
Hello everyone, I have a really interesting question here. I am measuring the factor of friction between two different metals. My results are a beat cloudy. When I use Steel - Brass surfaces the factor of friction, μ is being reduced while I am increasing the applied force. In other side, when I use Steel - Aluminum surfaces, when I am increasing the applied force on the two materials the factor of friction, μ goes up. Anyone can explain what is happening? There is no measurement mistake, that' s guaranteed.

You'll have to tell us a bit more: What are the magnitudes and ranges of normal forces that you're working with, how are the friction surfaces prepared, what pressure is involved, how is the normal force applied and how is the coefficient of friction measured? There are a lot of ways that your experimental setup could deviate from the ideal conditions in which the coefficient of friction is close to independent of the normal force.

(Also "no measurement mistake, that's guaranteed" is something that we've all regretted saying at least once. Just sayin' :smile:)
 
Nugatory said:
(Also "no measurement mistake, that's guaranteed" is something that we've all regretted saying at least once. Just sayin' :smile:)

One of our lab tutor told as so as, we aren' t supposed to focus on such a thing and focus on what' s going on :smile: I can understand you objections on that.

Now with the experiment part:
Our experimental setup includes a steel rotation disk, and to measure the friction factor we use some aluminum and brass rods of the same radius. We use pressures of 1, 2 and 3 bars which creates forces of about 106 N, 212 N and 318 N in our experimental setup.
The surfaces are being threw a high standard rectifier machine, which makes them really smooth. The forces are vertically applied on the rod. The coefficient of friction is measured by a electronical device which gives as the force of the friction. We use the type μ=T/(2*F) as we used two rods at the time, at the opposite side of the disk.

F: Applied Force
T: Friction Force
μ: Friction Factor
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K