Factorial Question | Solve k(n-1)! Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheRobsterUK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
TheRobsterUK
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about factorials that I'm hoping someone can help me with.

I know that the factorial n! means the product of the integers from 1 to n, for example if I have 4! then this is equal to 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 24, but I have an equation which contains the term:

k(n-1)!

I am not sure how to interpret this...for instance, if we assume that k=4 and n=8, does this give:

4(8-1)!
= 4 x 7!
= 4 x 5,040
= 20,160

Or does it give:

4(8-1)!
=4 x 7!
=28!
=3.0489 x 10^29

I'm guessing it's the first one but am not sure...can someone confirm or provide the correct answer please?

Many Thanks
-Rob
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that the notations:
(k(n-1))!, k((n-1)!) CANNOT be misunderstood.

The convention used, in order to save parentheses is:
k(n-1)!=k((n-1)!).

Note that this convention is akin to the one used with expressions involving a power:
A*B^{n}=A*(B^{n})
rather than (A*B)^{n}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top