MHB How do I factor a binomial with a coefficient of 4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter slowle4rner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Factoring
AI Thread Summary
To factor the binomial 4y^3 + 4, first factor out the common coefficient of 4, resulting in 4(y^3 + 1). The expression y^3 + 1 can be further factored using the sum of cubes formula, yielding 4(y + 1)(y^2 - y + 1). Although the coefficient 4 is not a perfect cube, it can remain factored out without affecting the overall expression. The final, most factored form is 4(y + 1)(y^2 - y + 1), which is the preferred answer for clarity and completeness.
slowle4rner
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble factoring the following binomial... can someone try to point me in the right direction please?

4y^3+4

It has been 7 years since I took algebra and I am trying to get my review done. This one just does not make sense to me right now...

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First factor the 4 out, to get:

$$4y^3+4=4\left(y^3+1 \right)=4\left(y^3+1^3 \right)$$

Now apply the sum of cubes formula:

$$a^3+b^3=(a+b)\left(a^2-ab+b^2 \right)$$

What do you get?
 
So...A^3+b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)

4y^3+4 = 4(y^3+1) = 4(y^3+1^3) = 4(y+1)(y^2-y+1)

That's basically what I came up with. I guess I am confused because I 4 is not a perfect cube and I didn't realize you could factor out the 4 and work the problem from there. But I suppose this makes sense assuming that I can multiply in the four and then multiply (4y+4)(y^2-y+1) or multiply 4(y+1)(y^2-y+1) and distribute the 4.

Would I be correct to presume that 4(y+1)(y^2-y+1) is the most factored and appropriate answer? That would seem to make sense to me...

Thanks for the help. I wasn't seeing it. Gratitude.
 
slowle4rner said:
So...[math]a^3+b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)[/math]

[math]4y^3+4 = 4(y^3+1) = 4(y^3+1^3) = 4(y+1)(y^2-y+1)[/math]

That's basically what I came up with. I guess I am confused because I 4 is not a perfect cube and I didn't realize you could factor out the 4 and work the problem from there. But I suppose this makes sense assuming that I can multiply in the four and then multiply $$(4y+4)(y^2-y+1)$$ or multiply $$4(y+1)(y^2-y+1)$$ and distribute the 4.

The 4 is a bit of a red herring because, as you said, it's not a perfect cube but you can leave that alone out the front. You could say $$(4y+4)(y^2-y+1)$$ (as well as $$(y+1)(4y^2-4y+4)$$) but it's good form to leave it fully factored which means not distributing the four. If you ever do exams they usually want it fully factored.

Would I be correct to presume that 4(y+1)(y^2-y+1) is the most factored and appropriate answer? That would seem to make sense to me...

Thanks for the help. I wasn't seeing it. Gratitude.

Yes, that is the correct answer.
 
Even if you were not able to factor that "4" out, it just a number! If it had been, say, x^3+ 4 you could write it as x^3+(\sqrt[3]{4})^3 and use that same fornula.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top