Factorizing Polynomials with Irrational Exponents

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdummie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
The polynomial P(x) = x^(2n) + 2cos(naπ)x^n + 1 can be factored by treating the cosine term as a constant, A = cos(naπ), leading to the quadratic form y^2 + 2Ay + 1 after substituting y = x^n. For the polynomial to be factorable in ℝ, the condition A^2 - 1 ≥ 0 must hold, which translates to cos^2(naπ) ≥ 1, implying naπ must equal 2kπ for integers k. The discussion highlights that since a is irrational, this condition can only be satisfied if na = 0, raising questions about the definition of n. Ultimately, the complexity of the polynomial suggests that numerical methods might be more practical for finding roots rather than attempting to factor it.
cdummie
Messages
147
Reaction score
5
I should factorize following polynomial:

P(x)=x^2n + 2cos(naπ)x^n + 1 in ℝ if i know that a is irrational number.

Things that confuse me here are following:

1. When factorizing polynomials, i have known exponents (unlike here, where i have 2n and n) so i don't know what to do with them?

2. Why does it makes a difference if a is irrational number?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you considered a substitution of variable x to make the equation a simple quadratic?
 
jedishrfu said:
Have you considered a substitution of variable x to make the equation a simple quadratic?

You mean like: y=xn, but what can i do next, that cosine there is confusing, and fact that a is irrational makes it even more complicated.
 
cdummie said:
You mean like: y=xn, but what can i do next, that cosine there is confusing, and fact that a is irrational makes it even more complicated.
The value of the cosine in your polynomial doesn't depend on x, so it may be treated like a constant. Call it A and re-write your original polynomial:

A = cos(naπ)

P(x) = x2n + 2Axn + 1

Now, make the substitution y = xn
 
SteamKing said:
The value of the cosine in your polynomial doesn't depend on x, so it may be treated like a constant. Call it A and re-write your original polynomial:

A = cos(naπ)

P(x) = x2n + 2Axn + 1

Now, make the substitution y = xn
Ok, so now i have the following:

y2 + 2Ay + 1

y1,2=[-2A+-sqrt(4A2 - 4)]/2 = -A +- sqrt(A2 - 1)

since A=cos(naπ) then A2=cos2(naπ) and A2 - 1 = cos2(naπ) - 1 =-sin2(naπ)

but -sin2(naπ) could be anywhere between -1 and 1 so i don't know is it positive or negative, because if it is negative then i can't factorize it in ℝ.
 
cdummie said:
Ok, so now i have the following:

y2 + 2Ay + 1

y1,2=[-2A+-sqrt(4A2 - 4)]/2 = -A +- sqrt(A2 - 1)

since A=cos(naπ) then A2=cos2(naπ) and A2 - 1 = cos2(naπ) - 1 =-sin2(naπ)

but -sin2(naπ) could be anywhere between -1 and 1 so i don't know is it positive or negative, because if it is negative then i can't factorize it in ℝ.
Obviously, in order to factor this polynomial in ℝ, certain conditions must be met; IOW, A2 - 1 ≥ 0, or A2 ≥ 1 or cos2(naπ) ≥ 1.

Since -1 ≤ cos (θ) ≤ 1, then the polynomial can be factored in ℝ only if naπ = 2kπ, where k = 0, 1, 2, ...

It's not clear why you would want to factor such a beast anyway. If you want to find the roots to P(x), it would seem that a numerical approach would work just as well.
 
  • Like
Likes cdummie
SteamKing said:
Obviously, in order to factor this polynomial in ℝ, certain conditions must be met; IOW, A2 - 1 ≥ 0, or A2 ≥ 1 or cos2(naπ) ≥ 1.

Since -1 ≤ cos (θ) ≤ 1, then the polynomial can be factored in ℝ only if naπ = 2kπ, where k = 0, 1, 2, ...

It's not clear why you would want to factor such a beast anyway. If you want to find the roots to P(x), it would seem that a numerical approach would work just as well.

Well, it's just an exam question, anyway, what's with a, i mean why is it pointed out that a has to be irrational number, the way we solved this, it wouldn't be any different even if a wasn't irrational number?
 
cdummie said:
Well, it's just an exam question, anyway, what's with a, i mean why is it pointed out that a has to be irrational number, the way we solved this, it wouldn't be any different even if a wasn't irrational number?
It's not clear what n is here. Is n any integer, or is it something else?

Since a is irrational, this suggests that the condition naπ = 2kπ can be satisfied only if na = 0, and this will depend on what values n can take.
 
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what n is here. Is n any integer, or is it something else?

Since a is irrational, this suggests that the condition naπ = 2kπ can be satisfied only if na = 0, and this will depend on what values n can take.
I don't know about n, it's not defined what n is, but it might be integer (probably it is), anyway, since it is not defined i can't be sure what it is.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top