Falling objects: remedial education desperately needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter usererror
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Education Falling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of falling objects, specifically the misconception that two objects of different masses released simultaneously would not fall side by side. The initial confusion stemmed from an incorrect application of Newton's second law, where the force of gravity is proportional to mass, leading to equal acceleration for both masses. Participants clarified that while mass affects gravitational force, it does not affect the rate of acceleration, which remains constant at 9.81 m/s² for both objects. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the underlying principles of physics rather than just applying formulas. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the need for a deeper comprehension of fundamental concepts in physics.
usererror
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I apologize many times in advance for asking what I suspect to be that which is the most repeated question on this site. Last night over dinner with friends, somebody whose judgment was impaired dared me to prove that two falling objects released simultaneously (the usual suspects like friction etc. ignored) of mass m and mass 2m would move side by side. My friend played a two year old asking ”why, why why?” no matter what I said. Not a problem: I was a philosophy student, so I was – am - one of those kids. Anyway, I knew from Middle School the classical laws of motion and the law of gravity, so I dived in. First, I used Galileo’s (I think he said this) thought experiment of two falling masses chained together. But, that seemed to beg the question and so I had to buy another round. Then, I resorted to deriving (via algebra) from f = ma that the acceleration for 2m is 1/2 that for 1m, thus showing that the acceleration of m is twice of 2m. But so what? I needed to prove, but I failed to prove, that, at each instant, m and 2m are side by side. In fact, my showing of the differences in acceleration seemed to falsify my point. I had managed to confuse myself. I had to buy another round. There was laughter. I don’t speak Calculus. Is there an algebraic manipulation of Galileo’s laws that gives the answer? Better yet, is there a thought experiment that does this without begging the question? thank you, physics folk.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
usererror said:
First, I used Galileo’s (I think he said this) thought experiment of two falling masses chained together. But, that seemed to beg the question and so I had to buy another round.
Galileo's clever argument should have been all you needed.

Then, I resorted to deriving (via algebra) from f = ma that the acceleration for 2m is 1/2 that for 1m, thus showing that the acceleration of m is twice of 2m.
The problem here is that you assumed that the force is constant, but it's not. The force of gravity is proportional to the mass. Twice the mass then twice the gravitational force. Just right to keep the acceleration constant.
 
Thanks to both responders. Now I get it. I am proud to have demonstrated that using the correct formula is not the same thing as understanding that formula. Thanks for the help.
 
"both" should be "all". (Is there anything else that I can screw up?)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top