Falling rod, finding velocity of CM

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rod of mass m and length l that is initially held vertically and begins to fall. The objective is to find the speed of its center of mass (CM) when the rod makes an angle θ with the vertical. The discussion revolves around applying Newton's laws and energy methods to analyze the motion of the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of Newton's laws and torque to derive relationships between forces and accelerations. There is a discussion about the validity of certain equations, particularly regarding the relationship between angular acceleration and linear acceleration of the CM.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's approach and are providing alternative perspectives on how to relate angular and linear quantities. Some guidance has been offered on how to eliminate time from the equations to express velocity as a function of angle, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem, particularly when it leads to a second-order differential equation. Participants are also considering the constraints of needing to express velocity in terms of angle rather than time.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


A rod of mass m and length l is held vertically on a smooth horizontal floor. If the rod begins to fall from this position, find the speed of its CM when it makes an angle ##\theta## with vertical.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


This is a solved problem in my book and it is solved using the energy method. I was wondering if this can be solved through Newton's laws.

The forces acting on the rod are its own weight and normal reaction from the floor.
From Newton second law:
$$mg-N=ma \,\,\,\, (*)$$

Taking torque about the CM:
$$N\frac{l}{2}\sin\theta=\frac{ml^2}{12}\alpha \,\,\,\, (**)$$
where ##\alpha## is the angular acceleration about CM. Since ##\alpha=a/(l/2)##, I substitute this in (**) and solve for N. From here I get a relation between N and a. Substituting this relation in (*), I get:
$$a=\frac{3g\sin\theta}{1+3\sin\theta}$$
Since, ##a=v(dv/dy)## and ##y=l/2(1-\cos\theta)##,
$$a=2v\frac{dv}{l\sin\theta d\theta}$$

Therefore,
$$2vdv=\frac{3gl\sin^2\theta}{1+3\sin\theta}d\theta$$
The next step is to integrate both the sides. I could not integrate the right hand side so I used Wolfram Alpha.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?t=crmtb01&f=ob&i=integrate sin^2(x)/(1+3sin(x)) dx

Wolfram Alpha gives a very strange answer and it does not match with the book's final answer.

Are my equations wrong? :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • stick.png
    stick.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Pranav-Arora! :smile:
Pranav-Arora said:
Since ##\alpha=a/(l/2)## …

nooo :redface:

(btw, your use of τ = Iα is valid, since this is a 1D case, and d/dt rc.o.m x vc.o.m = 0)
 
Hi tiny-tim! :)

tiny-tim said:
nooo :redface:

Why? I don't see any error there. :confused:
 
a is the (vertical) acceleration of the centre of mass

a = rα is correct when the point at distance r (in this case, the end of the rod) is fixed (and then the centre of mass is moving in a circle)

here, the end of the rod is moving, the centre of mass is not moving in a circle, y = l/2 cosθ, and a = y'' :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
a is the (vertical) acceleration of the centre of mass

a = rα is correct when the point at distance r (in this case, the end of the rod) is fixed (and then the centre of mass is moving in a circle)

here, the end of the rod is moving, the centre of mass is not moving in a circle, y = l/2 cosθ, and a = y'' :smile:


I am not sure if I get it. How do I find N then? Since ##\alpha=a/(l/2)## is invalid, do I have to substitute ##\alpha=d^2\theta/dt^2##?
 
yes :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
yes :smile:

Solving for N, I get:
$$N=\frac{ml}{6\sin\theta}\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}$$
Substituting in (*)
$$mg-\frac{ml}{6\sin\theta}\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}=m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2} \,\,\,\, (***)$$

Since ##y=(l/2)(1-\cos\theta)##, ##dy/dt=(l/2)\sin\theta d\theta/dt##, therefore,
$$\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=\frac{l}{2}\sin\theta \frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}+\frac{l}{2}\cos\theta\frac{d\theta}{dt}$$
Substituting the above in (***) gives a second order differential equation but solving this gives ##\theta## as a function of time and I need the velocity as a function of ##\theta##. :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Substituting the above in (***) gives a second order differential equation but solving this gives ##\theta## as a function of time and I need the velocity as a function of ##\theta##. :confused:

(your dθ/dt should be squared)

you can eliminate t by putting ω = dθ/dt,

and d2θ/dt2 = dω/dt = dω/dθ dθ/dt = ω dω/dθ :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
(your dθ/dt should be squared)

you can eliminate t by putting ω = dθ/dt,

and d2θ/dt2 = dω/dt = dω/dθ dθ/dt = ω dω/dθ :smile:

But I need velocity as a function of angle, not the angular velocity. :confused:
 
  • #10
i didn't say it was easy! :smile:

this is why it's so much easier to use energy :wink:
 
  • #11
tiny-tim said:
i didn't say it was easy! :smile:

this is why it's so much easier to use energy :wink:

Yes, you are right. I recognised the complexity when it lead me to a second order differential equation.

But still, is there no way to find velocity from angular velocity?
 
  • #12
you can solve that differential equation for ω as a function of θ,

and then use v = l/2 ω sinθ :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
tiny-tim said:
you can solve that differential equation for ω as a function of θ,

and then use v = l/2 ω sinθ :wink:

Thanks a lot tiny-tim! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K