So many questions, so a small resume, I started formal flying training in 1977 in Canada, with a few dozen hours on the Beechcraft Bonanza, followed by the http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/site/equip/ct114/default_e.asp at Cold Lake Alberta.
In the Netherlands I mainly flew the http://www.simwings.nl/nf5.htm for some 1600 hrs total from 1979-1991 and did about everything you can do with it. Then came the F-16 conversion which I flew until 1999, only a few hundred hours because of staff duties.
What's F-16 flying like? You have to consider that every step up is a major thrill and flying the NF-5 is already pretty demanding. But the big problem with that aircraft is that you're going to doubt about the law about preservation of energy

It does not preserve energy.

As soon as you demand some tough manouvring as in combat, it looses energy quickly and you find yourself back low and slow 0.5mv^2 + mgh = almost nothing and it takes a loooong time to get it back.
So that's the first big difference with the F-16. It let you fly where you want, with total energy perfectly preserved. But at the expensive of yourself because that tough manouvring generates high sustained acceleralarion forces, which you have to fight activily not to loose consiousness. And that's really physically highly demanding top sport.
Then there is this flying carpet feeling, sitting so high about the canopy seal that it seems that you're sitting on top of the aircraft rather than in it; giving an excellent full view all around.
Yet another big difference is that you're not controlling the aircraft but commanding a computer (three actually) to fly the aircraft according your inputs. The big difference is, who is doing the mechanical feedback to the control panels; ie to overcome inertia, an intial steering input is high and it would be reduced when the aircraft starts reacting to it. In conventional aircraft it's the pilot doing that, but don't do it in the F-16, starting with an aggressive high input to get the thing starting to move, since the computers will do it for you too. And the result of double initiation would be quite interesting but not that amusing. So you just give a basic input where you want to go and the computer does all the controlling.
There is a lot more to tell but perhaps some other time. Finally the landing is challenging too. A convential aircraft lands on minimum flying speed and highest flyable http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Dictionary/angle_of_attack/DI5.htm but not the F-16, because it would land tail first that way. So when it touches down, it's nowhere near ready flying and you'd have to convince the aircraft to stay on the ground. That can be challenging under higher crosswind conditions.