I Faster-than-Light Causality-Flip: Thought Experiment Reference?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikeal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Causality
Mikeal
Messages
27
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Bullet and train thought experiment
A few years ago I was studying special relativity and came across a thought experiment that explored a faster-than-light causality-flip. It consisted of an observer on the track-side firing a bullet at a speeding train, with the bullet entering the back of a carriage and exiting the front. There was a passenger in the center of the carriage witnessing the same event. The question was what combination of bullet speed and train speed would case the carriage-bound observer to see the bullet exiting the front before they saw it entering the back. Does anyone have a link to that though experiment reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Either exceeding ##c## will do it in some frame - which is impossible. The so-called "tachyonic anti-telephone" is a related thought experiment, which demonstrates the kind of "kill your own grandfather" paradoxes you could get if it were possible.
 
Mikeal said:
TL;DR Summary: Bullet and train thought experiment

A few years ago I was studying special relativity and came across a thought experiment that explored a faster-than-light causality-flip. It consisted of an observer on the track-side firing a bullet at a speeding train, with the bullet entering the back of a carriage and exiting the front. There was a passenger in the center of the carriage witnessing the same event. The question was what combination of bullet speed and train speed would case the carriage-bound observer to see the bullet exiting the front before they saw it entering the back. Does anyone have a link to that though experiment reference?
Suppose we have a train traveling at speed ##v## in some inertial frame and a bullet moving at speed ##u > v## in the same direction. If we take the origin to be when the bullet enters the back of the train, then the bullet emerges from the front of the train at:$$t = \frac{L}{u-v}, \ x = \frac{Lu}{u - v}$$Where ##L## is the length of the train in this frame. We can transform that event to the rest frame of the moving train to get the time coordinate:$$t' = \frac{\gamma_v L}{u - v}\big (1 - \frac {uv}{c^2} \big )$$First, just to check SR, we can take the speed of the bullet ##u \approx c## (or consider a beam of light instead of a bullet and have ##u =c##). In which case, we get:$$t' = \frac{\gamma_vL}{c} > 0$$And we see that the order of events is preserved across both frames (and, indeed, any other frame) for all valid speeds.

Suppose, however, we naively allow ##u > c##. If ##u## is large enough, then we can make ##\frac{uv}{c^2} > 1## and get ##t' < 0##. Thereby reversing the order of the events in the train frame.

This shows that FTL speeds and the Lorentz Transformation do not in general preserve causality. E.g. if in this case we consider the bullet fired from the back of the train, then we have a physical contradiction between the two frames.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Ibix
PeroK said:
Suppose we have a train traveling at speed ##v## in some inertial frame and a bullet moving at speed ##u > v## in the same direction. If we take the origin to be when the bullet enters the back of the train, then the bullet emerges from the front of the train at:$$t = \frac{L}{u-v}, \ x = \frac{Lu}{u - v}$$Where ##L## is the length of the train in this frame. We can transform that event to the rest frame of the moving train to get the time coordinate:$$t' = \frac{\gamma_v L}{u - v}\big (1 - \frac {uv}{c^2} \big )$$First, just to check SR, we can take the speed of the bullet ##u \approx c## (or consider a beam of light instead of a bullet and have ##u =c##). In which case, we get:$$t' = \frac{\gamma_vL}{c} > 0$$And we see that the order of events is preserved across both frames (and, indeed, any other frame) for all valid speeds.

Suppose, however, we naively allow ##u > c##. If ##u## is large enough, then we can make ##\frac{uv}{c^2} > 1## and get ##t' < 0##. Thereby reversing the order of the events in the train frame.

This shows that FTL speeds and the Lorentz Transformation do not in general preserve causality. E.g. if in this case we consider the bullet fired from the back of the train, then we have a physical contradiction between the two frames.
The above derivation confirms the result I came up with a while ago and explains the steps involved. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top