Faster than light theory #759309

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical implications of a helicopter propeller's motion in relation to the speed of light. It posits that if the inner section of a propeller could approach light speed, the outer section might exceed it, but this is challenged by the principles of special relativity. The conversation emphasizes that no material can be absolutely rigid, and thus, achieving such speeds is impossible. Additionally, the energy required to accelerate the inner section would surpass any feasible limits, complicating the scenario further. Ultimately, the consensus is that exceeding light speed remains unattainable due to fundamental physical laws.
malikah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
faster than light theory #759309...

imagine a propeller from a helicopter...we know that the part of the blade farthest form the pivot point moves faster than the section nearest to the pivot point... so in theory, if we could get the section nearset to the pivot point to move close to the speed of light, then would the outer most section be moving at, or faster than the speed of light? (taking into consideration that we are using the strongest materials we have and it is well lubed etc etc...) I'm not sure what purpose this would serve other than to get ones picture on the front of a science mag... but n e way...
 
Science news on Phys.org
no object is absolutely rigid as a consequence of special relativity. From an outsider's point of view, the blade would still be moving at a speed even nearer to the speed of light, when compared to the speed of the "section nearest to the pivot point".
There is no such "strongest" material anymore.
 
Even if you theoretically consider a very rigid material, you cannot get the outer section to be moving at a speed greater than or equal to that of light.
Because in this case, the energy that you need to supply to the inner part would still exceed any amount of energy,since actually you are also providing energy to the outer part, if only indirectly.
 
ahh..good answer..sigh...
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top