Fastest Terrestrial Sound Conduction Speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The fastest terrestrial sound conduction speed is found in diamond, reaching approximately 12 km/s, while graphene and carbon nanotubes also exhibit high sound speeds along their axes. The speed of P-waves, which are low-frequency sound waves generated by earthquakes, varies from 5 to 8 km/s depending on the Earth's interior, with speeds up to 13 km/s in the core. The velocity of sound is determined by the formula c = √(K/ρ), where K is the bulk modulus and ρ is the density of the material. Birch's law, which describes the relationship between sound velocity and density, is applicable to materials not under extreme pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave physics, specifically compression waves.
  • Familiarity with Birch's law and its implications in material science.
  • Knowledge of the Newton-Laplace equation for sound velocity.
  • Basic concepts of material properties such as bulk modulus and density.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of graphene and carbon nanotubes in relation to sound conduction.
  • Study the implications of Birch's law in geophysics and material science.
  • Explore the differences between P-wave and S-wave velocities in seismic studies.
  • Investigate the Newton-Laplace law and its applications in acoustics.
USEFUL FOR

Geophysicists, materials scientists, and acoustics engineers will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in sound propagation in various materials and geological formations.

Physics news on Phys.org
Don't know for certain, but diamond's speed of sound is pretty fast (12 km/s). Graphene and carbon nanotubes probably also have a high speed of sound in-plane/along the tube's axis. What you're looking for is a large bulk modulus (a measure of stiffness) and a low density, so your best bet is to look for light, strong materials.
 
Typical values for P-wave velocity in earthquakes are in the range 5 to 8 km/s. The precise speed varies according to the region of the Earth's interior, from less than 6 km/s in the Earth's crust to 13 km/s through the core.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-wave P-waves from earthquakes are very low frequency sound waves.

Sound waves are in fact compression waves: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/sound/Lesson-1/Sound-is-a-Pressure-Wave

See Birch's law : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birch's_law which holds for materials not under enormous pressure. Which seems to be somewhat at odds to what @TeethWhitener indicated.
 
jim mcnamara said:
See Birch's law : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birch's_law which holds for materials not under enormous pressure. Which seems to be somewhat at odds to what @TeethWhitener indicated.

well not entirely, as in the earth, higher density will generally be directly proportional higher pressure, so no problem there
It's just that you can have high density materials that don't need to be under high pressure, eg a block of lead
 
jim mcnamara said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-wave P-waves from earthquakes are very low frequency sound waves.

Sound waves are in fact compression waves: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/sound/Lesson-1/Sound-is-a-Pressure-Wave

See Birch's law : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birch's_law which holds for materials not under enormous pressure. Which seems to be somewhat at odds to what @TeethWhitener indicated.
The velocity of sound has a very simple functional form:
c=\sqrt{\frac{K}{\rho}}
Where c is velocity of sound, K is bulk modulus, and \rho is density.
EDIT: The discrepancy between Birch's law and the Newton-Laplace law (above) really bugged me, so I did some digging, thinking maybe Birch's law was the first few terms of a Taylor series approximating Newton-Laplace. The only thing I could really find were some "Birch Diagrams" from old geology papers, where the empirical linear velocity-density relationship from Birch's law is given by two points per material.
Example: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/JB078i029p06926/epdf
So here's where I'm stuck (and maybe we need a geologist to sort this out): are they really drawing a general law from two points of data? Because in that case, of course you get a linear relationship. So what gives? Is there some assumption in Newton-Laplace that doesn't apply here? Inhomogeneity, shear, dispersion, etc.? I dunno.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K