Feasibility of raising up an object with cord and satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBigK1d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical possibility of using a high-tensile-strength cord to levitate an object near Earth by connecting it to a satellite in geosynchronous orbit. It highlights the significant technical challenges, such as wind and weather, that would need to be addressed. The concept is compared to a traditional space elevator, noting that both ideas fundamentally rely on similar principles, including the need for a counterweight to maintain geosynchronous orbit. The key difference between the two concepts appears to be the specific orbital height of the satellite. Overall, the feasibility of such a variation remains speculative but intriguing.
TheBigK1d
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I know of the concept of a space elevator, and that right now it's not technologically in our grasp, but I thought up a variation on the concept.

Using a cord with huge tensile strength, could an object on, or very close to, Earth be levitated off of the ground if it was connected with this cord to an satellite in geo-synchronous orbit that's speed would compensate for the weight of the hanging object.

Of course there would be huge technical problems involved with the wind and weather, but would it be theoretically possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheBigK1d said:
I know of the concept of a space elevator, and that right now it's not technologically in our grasp, but I thought up a variation on the concept.

Using a cord with huge tensile strength, could an object on, or very close to, Earth be levitated off of the ground if it was connected with this cord to an satellite in geo-synchronous orbit that's speed would compensate for the weight of the hanging object.

Of course there would be huge technical problems involved with the wind and weather, but would it be theoretically possible?

What is the difference between that and the Space Elevator concept? Just the orbital height of the satellite?
 
berkeman said:
What is the difference between that and the Space Elevator concept? Just the orbital height of the satellite?

There's no difference at all . When you build a space elevator, you would also start at a geosynchronous orbit, and lower a really strong cord. You'll also need to let out a counterweight at a greater radius, or just raise the satellite while you lower the cord, to make sure the whole contraption stays in a geosynchronous orbit.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
61
Views
14K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top