Fender Washer Strength: Determining Adequate Load Capacity for Wire Rope Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter nation99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the adequacy of a fender washer's strength to maintain tension on a wire rope in a specific application involving a helical spring. Participants explore the potential failure modes of the washer and the overall assembly, considering various design modifications and alternatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the failure of the washer may depend on the inside diameter of the helical spring, which was initially unspecified.
  • One participant mentions that the aluminum ferrule will not have full contact with the fender washer due to distortion from crimping.
  • Concerns are raised about the wire not remaining axial in the spring, which could lead to sideways buckling.
  • A suggestion is made to add a sleeve between the wire rope and the spring's inside diameter to improve stability.
  • Calculations are presented regarding the dimensions of the washer and wire, indicating that the washer can be pulled through the spring.
  • Some participants propose using a stepped seat instead of the fender washer for better load distribution.
  • There are suggestions to consider using Belleville washers for their load-bearing characteristics, with some participants discussing the potential cost implications.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of maintaining tension on the wire rope while accommodating slight movements of the supporting structure.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability of the assembly and the potential for off-center load transfer from the spring to the washer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the adequacy of the fender washer, with some believing it may be stiff enough while others highlight potential stability issues. There is no consensus on the best approach, as multiple competing views and suggestions remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various design considerations, including the need for a stable assembly and the effects of the spring's non-flat bottom. There are also references to the limitations of the current washer design and the potential for using alternative components like Belleville washers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for DIY enthusiasts, engineers, and individuals interested in mechanical design and load-bearing applications, particularly those dealing with wire rope and spring assemblies.

nation99
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Please see the included sketch. I need to know if the fender washer I'm planning to use will be strong enough to not deform and thus reduce the tension on the wire rope. TIA, Dave

Fender Washer.jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Failure of the washer will depend on the unspecified inside diameter of the helical spring.
 
Baluncore said:
Failure of the washer will depend on the unspecified inside diameter of the helical spring.
Yes, forgot to include the spring info. Spring I.D, is 0.488 and the O.D. is 0.812. I should also mention that the aluminum ferruel will not have full contact with the fender washer due to distortion as a result of crimping it to the wire rope. Thanks.
 
Only the 0.095" wire centres the washer in the ID=0.488" spring.
For that reason, it is likely that the wire will not remain axial in the spring.

I am not saying the washer will fail, just that it will not constrain the position and alignment, to prevent buckling sideways of the spring.
 
I've considered that and am thinking about adding a sleeve to insert between the wire rope and the spring ID.
 
Washer annulus = ( 0.75 - 0.17 ) / 2 = 0.29"
Wire diameter = 0.095"
Sum of wire and annulus = 0.095 + 0.290 = 0.385"
That is less than the spring ID = 0.488"
So the washer can be pulled through the inside of the helical spring.

I would design a stepped seat to replace the fender washer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Joe591 and gmax137
Just get a bigger fender washer
 
You probably have guessed by now that I'm a DIYer and not an engineer. That being said, I do understand what you are suggesting is a possibility. Thus my original question...will the fender washer be stiff enough to maintain the load that it will see?
 
nation99 said:
You probably have guessed by now that I'm a DIYer and not an engineer. That being said, I do understand what you are suggesting is a possibility. Thus my original question...will the fender washer be stiff enough to maintain the load that it will see?
If it isn't, just use 2 or 3 of them.
 
  • #10
nation99 said:
Thus my original question...will the fender washer be stiff enough to maintain the load that it will see?
If you have ignored the obvious failure modes, and so build a house of cards, that design failure may later be investigated by a Coroner.

Look for data on a stainless steel belleville = cone shaped spring washer, that has a greater outer diameter, and will not flatten at 150 lb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belleville_washer

Nesting two different belleville washers may help centre the wire in the helical spring.

You might also consider simply replacing the carbon steel spring with a stack of alternated stainless-steel belleville washers, that gives the same spring constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
  • #11
nation99 said:
... Thus my original question...will the fender washer be stiff enough to maintain the load that it will see?
I believe that it will be stiff enough, but the assembly will not be stable, as mentioned above.

I have created a scale drawing with the dimensions that you have provided.
Note how the magenta spring is free to move toward the right and go over the outside diameter of your washer.

At a glance, that washer is the only member of your assembly that looks marginally able to match the other beefy elements.

Another factor that may make things worse is the non-flat bottom of that heavy duty spring (if the spiral ends have not been squared and ground to be flat), which will transfer the load completely off-center to the washer, which will not remain horizontal.

Note how commercial spring hangers, rather than flat washers, have spring cups at both ends of the spring, in order to avoid the discussed problem.

As you don't have those metal cups, a simple rubber sleeve located inside the spring, having the proper OD and ID, could greatly help with stability.
HSA-Hanger.jpg


compression-spring-ends-v2.jpg


Angle-spring-wire rope.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nation99 and Spinnor
  • #12
As described very well above, most springs are a poor match to this layout. They wriggle, squirm, create point-loads, lie skew and are generally 'a pain in the tool-kit'...

The flattened last-turns, centring sleeves, conical / domed washers, end-cups etc etc are each a part of solution. A flattened last-turn meeting sufficiently stepped washer at each end would seem simplest route. Also, if you hunt around, very thick washers are available. I've even seen them in craft-shops as 'loom weights', but their usual purpose is load spreading for foundation and similar heavy-duty fixings. I'm told they are handy as weld-on, bolt-through hard-points for sheet metal, where a stud's flange would not do.

( Think 'grommet' on fabric, be it ground-sheet or sail... )
 
  • #13
Baluncore said:
I would design a stepped seat to replace the fender washer.
@nation99 this would be a good approach. Maybe you or a friend has a lathe, these could be turned up in a matter of minutes. I would volunteer to do it for you but my lathe is out of service, I'm looking for a new motor...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213
  • #14
Lnewqban said:
I believe that it will be stiff enough, but the assembly will not be stable, as mentioned above.

I have created a scale drawing with the dimensions that you have provided.
Note how the magenta spring is free to move toward the right and go over the outside diameter of your washer.

At a glance, that washer is the only member of your assembly that looks marginally able to match the other beefy elements.

Another factor that may make things worse is the non-flat bottom of that heavy duty spring (if the spiral ends have not been squared and ground to be flat), which will transfer the load completely off-center to the washer, which will not remain horizontal.

Note how commercial spring hangers, rather than flat washers, have spring cups at both ends of the spring, in order to avoid the discussed problem.

As you don't have those metal cups, a simple rubber sleeve located inside the spring, having the proper OD and ID, could greatly help with stability.View attachment 333644

View attachment 333645

View attachment 333643
Thank you for your time and thoughts. The springs are plain and ground ends. I agree that installing a sleeve between the wire rope and the spring I.D. will add stability. All I want to do is to maintain tension on the wire rope and the spring is there to compensate for slight movement of the surrounding/supporting structure (treated wood). I'll continue looking for washers that may be a bit thicker. Thanks again!!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #15
nation99 said:
All I want to do is to maintain tension on the wire rope and the spring is there to compensate for slight movement of the surrounding/supporting structure (treated wood).
How much play are you expecting? @Baluncore has the right idea when he suggests a stack of Belleville washers for this amount of force.
 
  • #16
Nugatory said:
How much play are you expecting? @Baluncore has the right idea when he suggests a stack of Belleville washers for this amount of force.
I chose this spring because it provides a range of tension that is appropriate for the application when it is at the mid range of travel which is 0.200"...0.400 from full length to solid length. Belleville washers would be a good option, but I think the cost of the washers required to get that amount of travel would be cost prohibitive.

Expected travel is unknown, but I can imagine +/- .125" possible due to expansion and contraction of the treated wood.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K