I Fermi level change in semiconductors

Helena Wells
Messages
125
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
Does the acceptor level or donor level change if we change the base of the semiconductor?
Suppose we have a crystal lattice of doped Si with dopant Boron atoms. The energy level of the holes of the Boron atoms are just some eV above the valence band of Si.

My question: If we replace all the Si atoms with Ge atoms will the acceptor level change or not? I don't think it will change but why not ask it? In other words, does the acceptor level depend on the type of semiconductor we use as base?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The band structure is a product of the crystal structure (which reflects the structure of the base) as well as the interatomic spacing. The band gap for Silicon is twice that of Germanium and so yes it does depend. I believe the most important effect is the interatomic distance, but don't quote me..
 
So will it be higher or lower?Is there a general rule for it?
 
hutchphd said:
The band structure is a product of the crystal structure (which reflects the structure of the base) as well as the interatomic spacing. The band gap for Silicon is twice that of Germanium and so yes it does depend. I believe the most important effect is the interatomic distance, but don't quote me..
@hutchphd what are you studying/have you studied?
 
Long ago I did solid state theory...mostly surfaces and scattering from surfaces. I am now retired after doing optical, electronic, and systems design mostly for medical devices for 25 years . Also folks would occasionally hire me just for another novel look at a problem. I am a better engineer than I am a physicist...but I do love knowing the physics.
 
Helena Wells said:
So will it be higher or lower?Is there a general rule for it?

I do not believe there is a general rule of thumb. Especially in complex compund semiconductors (like oxides and nitrides).
However in 2003, it was shown that hydrogen has a universal energy level provided that the band gap of the semiconductor is aligned according to unified scale (for example aligned with respect to vacuum level).

This is the paper that pointed this out:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01665
 
  • Like
Likes Helena Wells
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top