Ferromagnetic effect at smaller/larger grain size

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how the ferromagnetic effect varies with particle or grain size, specifically at nanometer and micrometer scales. Smaller particles may not exhibit ferromagnetic properties, while medium-sized particles show observable effects, which diminish again at larger sizes. The relationship between grain boundaries and ferromagnetic domain walls is also questioned, with a focus on understanding the underlying reasons for these changes in behavior. The participant expresses a desire for more detailed explanations and insights from others. Overall, the inquiry highlights the complexities of ferromagnetism as it relates to particle size.
slayercantona
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I have faced with a problem in my report. The question said that "How can ferromagnetic effect change to depend on particle/grain size(at nm (10, 50, 100, 1000...) and at \mum (0.5, 1, 2...)?" (In shortly, what can we observe at feromagnetic effect if we increase and decrease of particle/grain size?). In my opinion, if I have so small particle, I can not observe any ferromagnetic effect or have medium size we can observe, but it will be larger than old, I cannot observe ferromagnetic effect again. But, I cannot explain the reason of these results. (Maybe my answers can be wrong:smile:). Has anybody know the answers of my questions?

I look forward to your answers. Thanks for everything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about the relationship between grain boundaries and ferromagnetic domain walls?
 
Gokul43201 said:
What do you know about the relationship between grain boundaries and ferromagnetic domain walls?

I don't know much more thing about them. But, I try to learn and solve their relationship. I read D6, 1/D, constant law some journals, but they don't give much more information. They are talked about just their size relationship, shortly. But, I wonder what is the reason of this changing?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top