Ferromagnetism and Work done by a bar magnet.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of ferromagnetism and the work done by bar magnets, particularly in the context of magnetic forces and electromotive force (emf) as described in Griffiths' electrodynamics textbook. Participants explore the relationship between magnetic forces, dipole currents, and the role of emf in lifting weights and the dynamics of magnet interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the role of emf in doing work against magnetic forces when lifting weights, particularly in the context of two bar magnets attracting each other.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the specific example from Griffiths' textbook to better understand the situation being discussed.
  • A participant clarifies that the emf from a battery does not do work against magnetic forces, asserting that magnetic forces cannot give or accept work, and explains the role of electric forces when magnets are released and accelerate.
  • There is a suggestion that the magnetic attraction between two magnets is influenced by electric forces once they are in motion, which may alter the energy dynamics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the role of emf in relation to magnetic forces and the dynamics of bar magnets. There are competing views regarding the mechanisms of work done and energy transfer in these scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of magnetic forces and their interaction with electric fields remain unresolved. The discussion also highlights the complexity of energy dynamics when magnets are in motion versus at rest.

siddharth5129
Messages
94
Reaction score
3
I was just doing a read-through of my freshman griffith's electrodynamics textbook ( I found my comprehension of electrodynamics slipping again ... always gets me edgy ) and I find my self flummoxed yet again. So he goes through an example of magnetic forces lifting a weight, and shows how it's actually the source of emf that's doing the work against magnetic forces to keep the weight moving upwards. This makes perfect sense. So I find that it would make sense when applied to say, two bar magnets attracting one another, if the magnetic forces somehow acted against the microscopic dipole currents and reduce their strength. If the magnet was reinforced with a electric coil, then the source emf would be doing the work against the magnetic forces, no problem there. But if it isn't, do the dipole currents reduce in strength ( in this case, alignment, seeing as the dipole moments that contribute to ferromagnetism are quantized ), as i am forced to conclude? Or am i missing something here? An iron magnet doesn't have an in built source of emf that does the work does it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On which page of Griffiths' book on electrodynamics is the example described? From you post it is not cleat what the situation looks like.
 
Section 5.1.3 of the text. Example 5.3, page 210 and 211. Thanks for your time.
 
emf of the battery does not do work against magnetic forces - those cannot give or accept work. The emf does work against electric field in the source (battery) to maintain voltage and electric field driving the current along the wire. If the current is strong enough, the magnetic force will accelerate the metal upwards. This acceleration goes with induced electric field of the source and the wire itself (due to current distribution changing its position in space) which acts back on the wire and does work against the gravity force. The gravitational potential energy comes from the energy of the battery.

In case of two magnets with solid magnetization, the attraction is due to magnetic forces, but as soon as the magnets are released and accelerate, electric forces kick in and do the work to increase kinetic energy of the magnets. This is at the expense of the original mutual magnetic energy of the magnets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K