Ferry Velocity and Passenger Motion: Solving for Direction and Magnitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a vector problem involving a passenger's motion on a ferry approaching a dock. The passenger's velocity is given as 1.2 m/s due north relative to the ferry and 4.5 m/s at an angle of 35 degrees west of north relative to the water. To find the ferry's velocity relative to the water, vector addition is necessary, using the equation that relates the three velocities. Participants suggest drawing a diagram to visualize the vector triangle and applying trigonometric methods to solve for the unknown ferry velocity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding vector relationships in motion problems.
tgoot84
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
HELP please: vector angles and velocity

Alright i don't nessesarily need an answer for this but maybe just a way to set it up. The problem is worded weird and no one can figure it out.

A passenger walks from one side of the ferry to the other side as it approaches a dock. If the passenger's velocity is 1.2 m/s due north relative to the ferry, and 4.5 m/s at an angle of 35 degrees west of north relative to the water, what are the direction and magnitude of the ferry's velocity relative to the water?

(blank) degrees west of north
(blank) m/s
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You just have to do some vector addition.

\vec v_{f/w} + \vec v_{m/f} = \vec v_{m/w}

where f = ferry, w = water, and m = man, and / = with respect to.

Drawing the triangle formed by the three vectors may help. Can you take it from there?
 
The passenger's velocity relative to the water equals the vector sum (the resultant) of her velocity relative to the ferry plus the ferry's velocity relative to the water.

So
Pw = Pf + Fw

In your problem Fw is the unknown. Set up a diagram illustrating this vector addition & solve it using simple trig.
 
How does this keep happening James?:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top