Feynman:"Laws of Dynamics" vs "Law of Dynamics"

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Odious Suspect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Richard Feynman's reference to "the law of dynamics" in The Feynman Lectures on Physics, specifically in Volume I, Chapter 9, section 9.5. This terminology is analyzed in relation to Newton's Second Law, expressed as F=dmv/dt. The inconsistency in terminology between "law of dynamics" and "Laws of Motion" is noted, with the author suggesting it reflects Feynman's artistic nuance rather than a typographical error. The section aims to clarify the relationship between force, acceleration, and displacement as outlined in Newton's Second Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with basic physics terminology
  • Knowledge of Feynman's Lectures on Physics
  • Basic grasp of mathematical expressions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Newton's Second Law in various physical contexts
  • Study the differences between "law of dynamics" and "Laws of Motion"
  • Investigate Feynman's approach to teaching physics concepts
  • Review Chapter 9 of The Feynman Lectures on Physics for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators seeking to understand Feynman's teaching style, and anyone interested in the nuances of classical mechanics terminology.

Odious Suspect
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
This is an observation, not a criticism. I noticed that in The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol-I, Chapter 9
Newton's Laws of Dynamics in section 9.5 he speaks of "the law of dynamics" in the singular

"That is where the law of dynamics comes in. The law of dynamics tells us what the acceleration is."

It's clear from the grammatical context that this is no mere typo. He is specifically intending Newton's Second Law, ##F=\frac{dmv}{dt}##. The terminology ingrained in my mind for Newton's three laws is "Newton's Laws of Motion" (which Feynman offers as an alternative).

If I wanted to be exceedingly pedantic, I could say that his inconsistent usage is in error by the very fact that it is inconsistent. I prefer to look upon it as an artistic nuance giving us insight into the workings of his mind.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought section 9.5 was to explain what eqn 9.12 signifies and the relation of force and thus acceleration with the displacement! well you only find that one in second law. I mean Newton's second law is sort of like the one with the that kind of relation. I think! :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K