Feynman rules for Yukawa theory

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of Feynman rules for scalar and pseudo-scalar Yukawa theory, with a specific interest in applications related to fermion decay. It is clarified that in the simplest Yukawa theory, fermion number conservation prevents the decay of fermions, as indicated by the U(1) symmetry of the Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian presented, H_{I}=g\phi\bar{\psi}\psi+h.c., does not allow for decay processes involving the fermion particle. Participants emphasize that no Feynman diagrams can represent the decay of the fermion in this theoretical framework. Overall, the conservation laws in Yukawa theory restrict fermion decay despite the presence of interaction terms.
lefebvre
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi. Do you know any book/paper/lecture notes where I can find complete derivation of Feynman rules for both scalar and pseudo-scalar Yukawa theory, and maybe an example of application to decay of fermion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Srednicki's QFT book does pseudoscalar Yukawa theory.

lefebvre said:
maybe an example of application to decay of fermion?

The fermion won't decay in a Yukawa theory because the fermion number is conserved. Unless you have something more than the simplest theory in mind?
 
The_Duck said:
The fermion won't decay in a Yukawa theory because the fermion number is conserved. Unless you have something more than the simplest theory in mind?

OK, I can see that the hamiltonian is: H_{I}=g\phi\bar{\psi}\psi+h.c.
And I have to use it to fermion decay. Isn't this the simplest Yukawa theory? Does this hermitian conjugate make different?
 
lefebvre said:
OK, I can see that the hamiltonian is: H_{I}=g\phi\bar{\psi}\psi+h.c.
And I have to use it to fermion decay. Isn't this the simplest Yukawa theory? Does this hermitian conjugate make different?

Are you talking about decay of the ##\psi## particle? There is a U(1) symmetry ##\psi \to e^{i \theta} \psi## under which the Hamiltonian is invariant. This leads to conservation of ##\psi## number. So the ##\psi## particle can't decay. Said another way, in this theory there are no Feynman diagrams you can draw that represent the decay of a ##\psi## particle.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K