Geremia
- 150
- 0
Are fictitious forces and constraint forces the same thing?
The discussion revolves around the relationship between fictitious forces and constraint forces, particularly in the context of D'Alembert's Principle. Participants explore the definitions, implications, and examples of both types of forces, examining their roles in non-inertial reference frames and geometrical configurations.
Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of fictitious and constraint forces, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the definitions of forces, the conditions under which they operate, and the implications of work and momentum in the context of constraint forces.
Yes, but how can geometry cause forces? Isn't force a change in momentum? Doesn't force imply movement? If a force isn't doing work, how is it a force?cmmcnamara said:No, fictitious forces are forces which arise from analyzing within a non-inertial reference frame. Constraint forces are those which arise from a geometrical configuration.
Yes, but what causes the constraint force, if not inertial effects?cmmcnamara said:For example, a constraint force would be perhaps a normal force exerted by the surface an object rests on such as an inclined plane problem. As long as the object is on the inclined plane, the object's motion is constrained to be along the inclined plane.
Constraint forces self-adjust so that they are exactly equal and opposite to the force they are opposing. So they do not do work and they do not cause a change in momentum. They balance other forces that would otherwise do work/cause change in momentum.Geremia said:Yes, but how can geometry cause forces? Isn't force a change in momentum? Doesn't force imply movement? If a force isn't doing work, how is it a force?Yes, but what causes the constraint force, if not inertial effects?