Fictitious Forces ⇔ Constraint Forces? (re: D'Alembert's Principle)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between fictitious forces and constraint forces, particularly in the context of D'Alembert's Principle. Participants explore the definitions, implications, and examples of both types of forces, examining their roles in non-inertial reference frames and geometrical configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that fictitious forces arise from non-inertial reference frames, while constraint forces are linked to geometrical configurations.
  • Examples provided include the normal force on an inclined plane as a constraint force and the Coriolis force as a fictitious force due to Earth's rotation.
  • Questions are raised about the nature of forces, including whether geometry can cause forces and how constraint forces operate without doing work or causing changes in momentum.
  • It is noted that constraint forces self-adjust to balance other forces, preventing work from being done or momentum from changing.
  • One participant emphasizes that net forces produce changes in momentum, while individual forces may not necessarily do so, and that work is not a requirement for a force to exist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of fictitious and constraint forces, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the definitions of forces, the conditions under which they operate, and the implications of work and momentum in the context of constraint forces.

Geremia
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Are fictitious forces and constraint forces the same thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, fictitious forces are forces which arise from analyzing within a non-inertial reference frame. Constraint forces are those which arise from a geometrical configuration.

For example, a constraint force would be perhaps a normal force exerted by the surface an object rests on such as an inclined plane problem. As long as the object is on the inclined plane, the object's motion is constrained to be along the inclined plane.

For a fictitious force consider that the Earth is in fact a rotating reference frame and therefore non-inertial. This gives rise to the Coriolis force which is needed to correct calculations due to this fact. It is small in effect but needed especially in large-distanced calculations.
 
cmmcnamara said:
No, fictitious forces are forces which arise from analyzing within a non-inertial reference frame. Constraint forces are those which arise from a geometrical configuration.
Yes, but how can geometry cause forces? Isn't force a change in momentum? Doesn't force imply movement? If a force isn't doing work, how is it a force?
cmmcnamara said:
For example, a constraint force would be perhaps a normal force exerted by the surface an object rests on such as an inclined plane problem. As long as the object is on the inclined plane, the object's motion is constrained to be along the inclined plane.
Yes, but what causes the constraint force, if not inertial effects?
 
Geremia said:
Yes, but how can geometry cause forces? Isn't force a change in momentum? Doesn't force imply movement? If a force isn't doing work, how is it a force?Yes, but what causes the constraint force, if not inertial effects?
Constraint forces self-adjust so that they are exactly equal and opposite to the force they are opposing. So they do not do work and they do not cause a change in momentum. They balance other forces that would otherwise do work/cause change in momentum.

AM
 
One should remember that NET forces produce a change in momentum. Any one individual force may or may not lead to a change in momentum.

A force is not required to do work. Work is the dot product of force and distance, so if the distance is 0, or if the force is applied perpendicular to the direction of motion, then the force does no work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K