Field transformation under Lorentz group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of massive particles under the Lorentz group as described in Steven Weinberg's "The Quantum Theory of Fields." Specifically, it addresses the equation U(Λ)Ψ_{p,σ} = N∑𝓓^{(j)}_{σ',σ}(W)Ψ_{Λp,σ'} and the definition of W as W = L^{-1}(Λp)ΛL(p), where L represents a 4x4 boost. The confusion arises from the classification of W as a 4x4 matrix rather than an element of SO(3), leading to questions about its representation within the context of the Lorentz group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations and the Lorentz group
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Knowledge of group theory, particularly representations of groups
  • Basic understanding of 4x4 matrices and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the representation theory of the Lorentz group in quantum field theory
  • Explore the mathematical structure of SO(3) and its relation to 4x4 matrices
  • Investigate the role of the little group in particle physics
  • Review Weinberg's "The Quantum Theory of Fields" for deeper insights into field transformations
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and researchers focusing on particle physics and group theory applications.

eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi!
In Weinberg's book "The quantum theory of fields", chapter2, it states that the transformation
of a massive particle is
<br /> U(\Lambda)\Psi_{p,\sigma}=<br /> N\sum\mathcal{D}^{(j)}_{\sigma&#039;,\sigma}(W)\Psi_{\Lambda p,\sigma&#039;}<br />
where W is an element in the little-group SO(3). But than it states that
<br /> W=L^{-1}(\Lambda p)\Lambda L(p)<br />
where L is a 4x4 boost.
But then W is not in SO(3), it's a 4x4 matrix! How can this be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W is a 4x4 matrix, an element of the group of 4x4 matrices isomorphic to SO(3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K