Final answer must be a whole number.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyrion101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Final
Tyrion101
Messages
166
Reaction score
2
In the case of a word problem that asks you to round the final answer to a whole number, and most of the secondary steps involve decimals, do you keep the decimals until the end of the problem or do you round each answer to a whole number? For instance you're given two sides of a triangle which are 520, and 800. One angle is 46. When I get an answer do I say this is an arbitrary answer: 28.7563, do I keep that, until I get the final angle I'm really solving for?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do all the calculations and upon finishing them, round your result.
 
That's what I thought thanks.
 
If you had a very long isosceles triangle with angle 0.4o and were asked to find the area, if you first rounded that angle to 0, you'd get an answer of 0. Clearly this is an extreme example but accentuates how your answer could be very far from the correct answer with premature rounding.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top