Final velocity of a ball down a ramp.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the final velocity of a ball rolling down a ramp and the implications of acceleration due to gravity. It confirms that while the equations mgh = 1/2mv^2 and vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad yield the same final velocity of 7.6 m/s, the acceleration is not always 9.8 m/s² when considering the ramp's shape and frictionless conditions. The normal force does not decrease gravitational force but partially opposes it, affecting the acceleration experienced by the ball. Additionally, if the ball rolls, some kinetic energy is converted into rotational energy, further influencing the final linear velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE)
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion, specifically mgh = 1/2mv^2 and vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad
  • Basic knowledge of forces, including normal force and friction
  • Concept of rotational dynamics, particularly in rolling motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the effects of friction on rolling objects in physics
  • Study the principles of rotational kinetic energy and its impact on linear velocity
  • Investigate different ramp shapes and their effects on acceleration and velocity
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems, particularly in ramps and inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy conservation, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to motion on inclined planes.

HHH
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a ball is dropped down a ramp of any shape, will the acceleration always be 9.8 assuming there is no friction.

Homework Equations


I know you can use mgh = 1/2mv^2 to solve for velocity, but can you use vf^2 = vi^2 + 2(a)(d)

The Attempt at a Solution


If you use both equations you get the same answer for final velocity at the bottom of the ramp. However is the acceleration always 9.8 no matter what the shape of the ramp is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see any attempt to answer the question here. Think about forces.
 
Does it have to do with the normal force decreasing the force of gravity?
 
HHH said:
Does it have to do with the normal force decreasing the force of gravity?
Well, it doesn't decrease it, but it does partially oppose it.
 
so the acceleration would not be 9.8? if not why can you use both equations?

mgh = 1/2mv^2
(2)x(9.8)x(3) = 1/2 (2) v^2
v = 7.6m/s

vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad
vf^2 = 0 + 2(9.8)(3)
v = 7.6m/s
 
HHH said:
so the acceleration would not be 9.8? if not why can you use both equations?

mgh = 1/2mv^2
(2)x(9.8)x(3) = 1/2 (2) v^2
v = 7.6m/s

vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad
vf^2 = 0 + 2(9.8)(3)
v = 7.6m/s
Ignoring the fact that it's a ball for the moment, just treating it as a zero friction ramp, those (that) equation only tells you the final velocity. It doesn't tell you how long it takes to get there. The final velocity is the same whether dropped straight down or going down a ramp. It only depends on the PE lost. But it takes longer down the ramp, so the acceleration is less.

If it is a rolling ball, that starts off not rotating, then there is another issue. At the end some of the KE will be in rotational energy, so the linear velocity will be less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AAAA and HHH
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K