Find A and B: Solving a Tricky Partial Fractions Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a partial fractions problem related to finding constants A and B in the context of inverse Laplace transforms. The original poster presents an equation involving these constants and seeks assistance in determining their values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the choice of values for x that could simplify the equation to isolate A and B. There are discussions about the implications of using specific values and the nature of the functions involved. Some participants suggest that the original equation may have been misinterpreted, while others question the setup of the partial fractions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the structure of the equation and the requirements for using partial fractions. There is a recognition of the need to adjust the approach due to the perfect square in the denominator, and some guidance has been provided regarding the correct form to use.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific forms and relationships in the context of Laplace transforms, indicating that the problem is situated within a broader mathematical framework. There are mentions of potential mistakes and clarifications regarding the expressions being used.

cabellos
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
dumb partial fractions question...

suppose i get x+1=A(x-2)+B(x-2)

how do you then find A and B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which values of x could you chose so that the equation simplified to leave you with a single unknown?
 
By demanding you've got an IDENTITY there, and remembering that the functions f(x)=1 and g(x)=x are linearly INDEPENDENT functions.
This will give you two equations for your two unknows A and B.
 
But say I use 2 as my x value, it removes both A and B in this equation...
 
Oops, I didn't see that closely!
You've made a mistake somewhere.
 
i haven't made a mistake i have to find the inverse laplace transform of s+1/(s^2 - 4s + 4) and I am using partial fractions to do this...but I am stuck now...:cry:
 
cabellos said:
i haven't made a mistake i have to find the inverse laplace transform of s+1/(s^2 - 4s + 4) and I am using partial fractions to do this...but I am stuck now...:cry:
The denominator is a perfect square. You need to use a different form for the sum of fractions. Have you seen this before?

Is that s+1/(s^2 - 4s + 4) or (s+1)/(s^2 - 4s + 4)??

I assume the second based on your original equation.
 
Last edited:
ok thanks - does this mean i find the inverse laplace transform of 1/(s-2)^2 and add this to the inverse LT of s/(s-2)^2 ?

I can do the first that would be te^2t wouldn't it?

Not sure about the second part? :cry:
 
cabellos said:
ok thanks - does this mean i find the inverse laplace transform of 1/(s-2)^2 and add this to the inverse LT of s/(s-2)^2 ?

I can do the first that would be te^2t wouldn't it?

Not sure about the second part? :cry:
If you can use tables, go here

http://www.vibrationdata.com/Laplace.htm

2.10 confirms your first term, and 2.15 cannot be used for a perfect square denominator. Partial fractions will get rid of the s in the numerator for you, and you will get a 2.9 form and a 2.10 form. Yes??
 
  • #10
i can see the first relationship with 2.10 but what do i need to do to s/(s-2)^2 ? use partial fractions? Thats what i tried at the start but how do i find A and B if s = A(s-2) + B(s-2) ?
 
  • #11
cabellos said:
i can see the first relationship with 2.10 but what do i need to do to s/(s-2)^2 ? use partial fractions? Thats what i tried at the start but how do i find A and B if s = A(s-2) + B(s-2) ?
You cannot use that form when the denominator is a perfect square. Use
(s + 1)/(s - 2)² = A/(s - 2) + B/(s - 2)²
 
  • #12
how does that change anything...still can't solve A and B??
 
  • #13
cabellos said:
how does that change anything...still can't solve A and B??
Sure you can.

(s + 1)/(s - 2)² = A/(s - 2) + B/(s - 2)²

s + 1 = A*(s - 2) + B

s + 1 = As - 2A + B
arildno said:
By demanding you've got an IDENTITY there, and remembering that the functions f(x)=1 and g(x)=x are linearly INDEPENDENT functions.
This will give you two equations for your two unknows A and B.
A = 1

1 = -2A + B

B = 1 + 2A = 3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
835
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K