Find a formula for the intersection math

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a formula for the intersection of two intervals, I = (a, b) and J = (c, d), particularly when they have a nonempty intersection. Participants are exploring the conditions under which the intersection occurs and the implications of different interval types (open vs. closed).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for nonempty intersections and the correct representation of these intersections. Questions arise about the nature of the intervals and the implications of their boundaries, particularly regarding open and closed intervals.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the conditions that lead to nonempty intersections, with some participants providing examples and counterexamples. Clarifications about notation and the nature of intervals are being addressed, but no consensus has been reached on the correct formula for the intersection.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the differences between open and closed intervals, with some expressing confusion about notation and the implications of different cases for intersection. The discussion includes various assumptions and interpretations that may affect the understanding of the problem.

ZioX
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
Let I=(a,b) and J=(c,d) with I and J having a nonempty intersection. Find a formula for the intersection of I and J and prove it.

When a<c I have found that the intersection is [c,b]. Now I need to prove that it is. The way I intend to prove it is by showing that [c,b] and the intersection of I and J are both subsets of each other. I've done one, [c,b] being a subset of I intersect J.

I intersect J being a subset of [c,b] is a bit trickier. I've broken it down to:

let x be an element of I intersect J then x is an element of I and x is an element of J. Then:

a<=x<=b and c<=x<=d.

Now this is where I'm stumped.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZioX said:
Let I=(a,b) and J=(c,d) with I and J having a nonempty intersection. Find a formula for the intersection of I and J and prove it.

When a<c I have found that the intersection is [c,b]. Now I need to prove that it is. The way I intend to prove it is by showing that [c,b] and the intersection of I and J are both subsets of each other. I've done one, [c,b] being a subset of I intersect J.

I intersect J being a subset of [c,b] is a bit trickier. I've broken it down to:

let x be an element of I intersect J then x is an element of I and x is an element of J. Then:

a<=x<=b and c<=x<=d.

Now this is where I'm stumped.

Are I and J sets? Like on the real line?
 
If a<c, how do you know if c<b to make an intersection of [c,b]? And, how can an intersection of two open sets become closed?

If a<c and b<c, then there is no intersection.
 
Ooops. Yes, I and J are intervals. Intersection is nonempty.
 
ZioX said:
Ooops. Yes, I and J are intervals. Intersection is nonempty.

There's a formula for solving this?

Note: The intersection of two open intervals is an open interval, so I don't know why you represent the intersection as a closed interval.

You said if a<c, then the intersection is NOT [c,b] or necessarily (c,b) because what if d<b, then the intersection is in fact (c,d) and not (c,b) like you're assuming.
 
If you want to do well in Analysis, you are going to have to make an effort to at least write things correctly!. (a, b) is not the same as [a,b] and you are confusing the two.

Jason Rox said:
When a<c I have found that the intersection is [c,b].
No, you haven't- for two reasons. First, as others said, the intersection of the two open intervals, (a,b) and (c,d) cannot be the closed interval (c,b)- you are being careless with your notation. More importantly, what if a= 0, b= 10, c= 1, d= 2- that is, I= (0, 10) and J= (1, 2). Then the intersection is (1, 2), not (1, 10).
 
There are only four possibilities that produce a non-empty intersection, namely:

a < c < b < d
a < c < d < b
c < a < b < d
c < a < d < b

now convince yourself that [tex]I\cap J = (a,b)\cap (c,d) = \left( \max \{ a,c\} , \min \{b,d\} \right)[/tex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
If you want to do well in Analysis, you are going to have to make an effort to at least write things correctly!. (a, b) is not the same as [a,b] and you are confusing the two.


No, you haven't- for two reasons. First, as others said, the intersection of the two open intervals, (a,b) and (c,d) cannot be the closed interval (c,b)- you are being careless with your notation. More importantly, what if a= 0, b= 10, c= 1, d= 2- that is, I= (0, 10) and J= (1, 2). Then the intersection is (1, 2), not (1, 10).

I never said that!
 
benorin said:
There are only four possibilities that produce a non-empty intersection, namely:

a < c < b < d
a < c < d < b
c < a < b < d
c < a < d < b

now convince yourself that [tex]I\cap J = (a,b)\cap (c,d) = \left( \max \{ a,c\} , \min \{b,d\} \right)[/tex]

That's what I was thinking.
 
  • #10
JasonRox said:
I never said that!
Never said what?

In your first post you definitely did say
When a<c I have found that the intersection is [c,b].
 
  • #11
No he didn't. Zoix wrote it. Just scroll upwards...
 
  • #12
I wasn't being careless in notation. I do know the difference between closed and open intervals, and their specific notation. I did indeed use notation for both open and closed intervals in my OP. I made the mistake that I thought the intersection would be a closed interval (which is why I used closed interval notation)...since they overlap they would have both, but I realize the error in this. I hope you realize your error too.
 
  • #13
Just falling on this I thought it was funny. Actually, I think there are 9 possibilities of nonempty intersection:

a < c < b < d
a < c < d < b
c < a < b < d
c < a < d < b
a = c < b < d
a = c < d < b
a < c < b = d
c < a < b = d
a = c < b = d

Still get [tex]I\cap J = (a,b)\cap (c,d) = \left( \max \{ a,c\} , \min \{b,d\} \right)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K