Find a positive integer 'm' such that m/2 is a perfect square and m/3 is a perfect cube

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find a positive integer 'm' such that m/2 is a perfect square and m/3 is a perfect cube, the prime factorization approach leads to the solution m = 648, which is derived from the factors 3^4 and 2^3. The discussion also touches on the impossibility of constructing an equilateral triangle using only lattice points, confirming that it cannot be done if one side is parallel to an axis. The height of such a triangle is given by the formula h = (l√3)/2, which supports this conclusion. The problem of lattice points involves a complex system of equations, indicating a deeper mathematical challenge. Overall, the thread explores both number theory and geometric constraints.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
"Find a positive integer 'm' such that m/2 is a perfect square and m/3 is a perfect cube."

How to solve it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
consider m's prime decomposition
 
The smallest one can find is

M=3^{4}\cdot 2^{3}=648

Daniel.
 
Prime factorization::thanks

Now just one more question: Is it impossible to construct an equilateral triangle using only lattice points?---(i.e., points with integer coordinates)
My work says no---but can it be done?
 
Nope,if one of the sides is || with one of the axis of coordinates...The height of the triangle is

h=\frac{l\sqrt{3}}{2}...(that justifies it)...

As for the general case,it is a system of 3 equations with 6 unknowns...

Daniel.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top