Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around finding a strong, non-conductive material suitable for high-pressure applications, specifically for layering on piezoelectric components. Participants explore various materials, their properties, and potential applications, while addressing concerns related to pressure, moisture absorption, and electrical conductivity.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Experimental/applied
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks a non-conductive material that can withstand pressures up to 35 MPa (5000 psi) in sheet form for layering on electrical components.
- Several materials are proposed, including Tufnol 2F/14, Tufnol 10G/42, and Isola/Shengyi FR4/FR4HiTg, with some participants expressing opinions on their suitability.
- Questions are raised about whether one side of the material will be exposed to lower pressure, suggesting the use of standard pressure vessel components.
- Concerns are expressed regarding the performance of Tufnol 1P/13 compared to other materials for demanding applications.
- One participant mentions the need for the material to withstand large forces (up to 10 kN) at various frequencies while remaining non-conductive.
- Another participant suggests testing pairs of piezoelectric components in opposition to ground the outside of both units, proposing alternative insulating materials like ceramic plates.
- Moisture absorption into fibers at the cut edge of materials is highlighted as a potential issue, which may affect electrical conductivity under pressure.
- A late contribution suggests tempered glass as a simple and effective solution, capable of withstanding pressures up to 100 MPa.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express multiple competing views regarding the best material choice, with no consensus reached on a single solution. Concerns about specific materials and their properties are debated, indicating unresolved preferences and requirements.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention various assumptions, such as the nature of the pressure (hydrostatic vs. axial) and the need for moisture management, which may influence material selection. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.