Find a Strong and Non-Conductive Material for High Pressure Applications

  • Thread starter Thread starter tbader
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a strong, non-conductive material suitable for high-pressure applications, specifically for layering on piezoelectric components. Participants explore various materials, their properties, and potential applications, while addressing concerns related to pressure, moisture absorption, and electrical conductivity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a non-conductive material that can withstand pressures up to 35 MPa (5000 psi) in sheet form for layering on electrical components.
  • Several materials are proposed, including Tufnol 2F/14, Tufnol 10G/42, and Isola/Shengyi FR4/FR4HiTg, with some participants expressing opinions on their suitability.
  • Questions are raised about whether one side of the material will be exposed to lower pressure, suggesting the use of standard pressure vessel components.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the performance of Tufnol 1P/13 compared to other materials for demanding applications.
  • One participant mentions the need for the material to withstand large forces (up to 10 kN) at various frequencies while remaining non-conductive.
  • Another participant suggests testing pairs of piezoelectric components in opposition to ground the outside of both units, proposing alternative insulating materials like ceramic plates.
  • Moisture absorption into fibers at the cut edge of materials is highlighted as a potential issue, which may affect electrical conductivity under pressure.
  • A late contribution suggests tempered glass as a simple and effective solution, capable of withstanding pressures up to 100 MPa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the best material choice, with no consensus reached on a single solution. Concerns about specific materials and their properties are debated, indicating unresolved preferences and requirements.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions, such as the nature of the pressure (hydrostatic vs. axial) and the need for moisture management, which may influence material selection. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

tbader
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a non-conductive material that can withstand pressures up to 35 MPa or about 5000 psi. It has to be in sheet form so I can layer on some electrical components I have.

This may be a simple answer, but any help is appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Will one side be exposed to a lower pressure? It would be easier to use some standard pressure vessel component and mount the insulating layer to that. Is that an option?

BoB
 
Nidum said:
Whats your opinion on the tufnol 1P/13

--http://[URL="http://www.tufnol.com/materials-full/paper-laminates/tufnol-grade-1p-13.aspx"]www.tufnol.com/materials-full/paper-laminates/tufnol-grade-1p-13.aspx[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Generally not as good as the other ones for more demanding engineering applications .

Tell me a bit more about what you need this material for and I can probably give a more detailed answer .
 
Nidum said:
Generally not as good as the other ones for more demanding engineering applications .

Tell me a bit more about what you need this material for and I can probably give a more detailed answer .
I'm looking to layer it on various various piezoelectric components. I'm testing these piezo components with an electro mechanical testing system but the "sheets" i lay on the top/bottom of these components cannot be conductive and withstand large forces (up to 10kN) at various frequencies
 
Looking like the best choice as well. Do you recommend any US websites you can buy it from?
 
  • #10
tbader said:
I'm looking for a non-conductive material that can withstand pressures up to 35 MPa or about 5000 psi.
Is the 35MPa hydrostatic pressure or the axial pressure applied to a stack of components in a press ? If it is in a press then preventing extrusion of the sheet may be a problem.

You might also consider testing pairs of piezoelectric components in opposition. That would electrically ground the outside of both units. In the same way a ceramic plate or a disconnected piezo element could be used as an insulator.

Do you need to consider acoustic impedance matching in the choice of material ?
 
  • #11
Baluncore said:
Is the 35MPa hydrostatic pressure or the axial pressure applied to a stack of components in a press ? If it is in a press then preventing extrusion of the sheet may be a problem.

You might also consider testing pairs of piezoelectric components in opposition. That would electrically ground the outside of both units. In the same way a ceramic plate or a disconnected piezo element could be used as an insulator.

Do you need to consider acoustic impedance matching in the choice of material ?
Its axial pressure by a press and no need to consider acoustic impedance. I think the suggestion for Tufnol is the best. What is your opinion on the material?
 
  • #12
I would be concerned by moisture absorption into fibres at the cut edge. All polymers and fillers absorb some moisture over time. When pressure is applied the absorbed water may move to the cut edge. That may change the electrical conductivity across the sheet. Depending on formulation and environment it may be necessary to treat the cut edge or replace the material on a regular basis.
 
  • #13
Little late:
I'll say that a sheet of glass is the simplest solution. Up to 100 MPa, and cheap!
The "tempered glass" protector for phone screens is thin and should fit well
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
679
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
26K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K