MHB Find All Integers for Equal Sum Disjoint Union Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying integers \( n \) for which the set \( \{1,2,3,4, ...,n\} \) can be partitioned into three subsets \( A \), \( B \), and \( C \) with equal sums. A key point raised is that \( n \) must be divisible by 3 to achieve this equal partitioning. Participants express agreement on this condition, confirming that it aligns with the mathematical requirements for such a disjoint union. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of divisibility by 3 for the solution to hold true. Overall, the consensus is that only integers satisfying this divisibility condition can form the desired subsets.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find all integers $n$ such that the set $\{1,2,3,4, ...,n\}$ can be written as the disjoint union of the subsets $A$ , $B$ , $C$ whose sum of elements are equal.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Find all integers $n$ such that the set $\{1,2,3,4, ...,n\}$ can be written as the disjoint union of the subsets $A$ , $B$ , $C$ whose sum of elements are equal.
Wouldn't that just be all (non-negative) integers such that n is divisible by 3??

-Dan
 
lfdahl said:
Find all integers $n$ such that the set $\{1,2,3,4, ...,n\}$ can be written as the disjoint union of the subsets $A$ , $B$ , $C$ whose sum of elements are equal.

sum of n integers has to be multiple of 3.

So the number of numbers has to be 3n + 3 or 3n + 2

each set can not contain 1 element each then the sum cannot be equal

so start with 5 we have 3 set $5,(1,4),(2,3)$

for 6 we have $(1,6),(2,5),(3,4)$

for 9 (from magic square we get $(2,9,4), (3,5,7), (8,1,6)$

for 8 we have $(8,4), (2,7,3), (1,5,6)$

now for any number of the form $3n + 2 ( n >=4)$ is of the form $9k + 2 ( 9(k-1) + 6 + 5)$ or $9k + 5$ or $9k + 8$

by grouping as above we can get any number of the from 3n + 2 into 3 equal part and of the form 3n into equal parts

so number of the from $3n + 2$ or $3n + 3$ (n >= 1) (same as 3k with k >=2)
 
...sum of elements...
Got it now.

-Dan
 
Thankyou, kaliprasad, for your participation :cool:

I believe, the suggested solution below is in overall agreement with your considerations:

Since \[\sum_{x\in A}x +\sum_{x\in B}x+ \sum_{x\in C}x = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}\]

the RHS must be divisible by $3$ and therefore $n$ is congruent to one of $0,2,3,5$ modulo $6$.
Now we prove, that if $n$ is congruent to one of $0,2,3,5$ modulo $6$ and $n > 4$, then such a partition exists.

If we can find such partition for some $n$, then we can enlarge it to an admissible partition for $n+6$ by adjoining $n+1$ and $n+6$ to $A$; $n+2$ and $n+5$ to $B$; $n+3$ and $n+4$ to $C$.
For $n = 5,6,8,9$ we have the following partitions:

$n = 5 \;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,4\}\;\;\;\;\;\;B=\{2,3\}\;\;\;\;\;\;C = \{5\}$

$n = 6\;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,6\}\;\;\;\;\;\;B=\{2,5\}\;\;\;\;\;\;C = \{3,4\}$

$n = 8\;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,2,3,6\}\;\;\;\;B=\{5,7\}\;\;\;\;\;C = \{4,8\}$

$n = 9\;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,2,3,4,5\}\;\;\;B=\{7,8\}\;\;\;\;\;C = \{6,9\}$

Obviously, for $n \le 4$ such a partition does not exist.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top