MHB Find All Integers for Equal Sum Disjoint Union Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying integers \( n \) for which the set \( \{1,2,3,4, ...,n\} \) can be partitioned into three subsets \( A \), \( B \), and \( C \) with equal sums. A key point raised is that \( n \) must be divisible by 3 to achieve this equal partitioning. Participants express agreement on this condition, confirming that it aligns with the mathematical requirements for such a disjoint union. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of divisibility by 3 for the solution to hold true. Overall, the consensus is that only integers satisfying this divisibility condition can form the desired subsets.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find all integers $n$ such that the set $\{1,2,3,4, ...,n\}$ can be written as the disjoint union of the subsets $A$ , $B$ , $C$ whose sum of elements are equal.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Find all integers $n$ such that the set $\{1,2,3,4, ...,n\}$ can be written as the disjoint union of the subsets $A$ , $B$ , $C$ whose sum of elements are equal.
Wouldn't that just be all (non-negative) integers such that n is divisible by 3??

-Dan
 
lfdahl said:
Find all integers $n$ such that the set $\{1,2,3,4, ...,n\}$ can be written as the disjoint union of the subsets $A$ , $B$ , $C$ whose sum of elements are equal.

sum of n integers has to be multiple of 3.

So the number of numbers has to be 3n + 3 or 3n + 2

each set can not contain 1 element each then the sum cannot be equal

so start with 5 we have 3 set $5,(1,4),(2,3)$

for 6 we have $(1,6),(2,5),(3,4)$

for 9 (from magic square we get $(2,9,4), (3,5,7), (8,1,6)$

for 8 we have $(8,4), (2,7,3), (1,5,6)$

now for any number of the form $3n + 2 ( n >=4)$ is of the form $9k + 2 ( 9(k-1) + 6 + 5)$ or $9k + 5$ or $9k + 8$

by grouping as above we can get any number of the from 3n + 2 into 3 equal part and of the form 3n into equal parts

so number of the from $3n + 2$ or $3n + 3$ (n >= 1) (same as 3k with k >=2)
 
...sum of elements...
Got it now.

-Dan
 
Thankyou, kaliprasad, for your participation :cool:

I believe, the suggested solution below is in overall agreement with your considerations:

Since \[\sum_{x\in A}x +\sum_{x\in B}x+ \sum_{x\in C}x = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}\]

the RHS must be divisible by $3$ and therefore $n$ is congruent to one of $0,2,3,5$ modulo $6$.
Now we prove, that if $n$ is congruent to one of $0,2,3,5$ modulo $6$ and $n > 4$, then such a partition exists.

If we can find such partition for some $n$, then we can enlarge it to an admissible partition for $n+6$ by adjoining $n+1$ and $n+6$ to $A$; $n+2$ and $n+5$ to $B$; $n+3$ and $n+4$ to $C$.
For $n = 5,6,8,9$ we have the following partitions:

$n = 5 \;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,4\}\;\;\;\;\;\;B=\{2,3\}\;\;\;\;\;\;C = \{5\}$

$n = 6\;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,6\}\;\;\;\;\;\;B=\{2,5\}\;\;\;\;\;\;C = \{3,4\}$

$n = 8\;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,2,3,6\}\;\;\;\;B=\{5,7\}\;\;\;\;\;C = \{4,8\}$

$n = 9\;\;\;\;\;\;A = \{1,2,3,4,5\}\;\;\;B=\{7,8\}\;\;\;\;\;C = \{6,9\}$

Obviously, for $n \le 4$ such a partition does not exist.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K