MHB Find all pairs (m,k) of integer solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all solutions to $(m^2+k)(m+k^2)=(m-k)^3$, where $m$ and $k$ are non-zero integers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find all solutions to $(m^2+k)(m+k^2)=(m-k)^3$, where $m$ and $k$ are non-zero integers.
[sp]Multiply out the brackets: $$m^3 + m^2k^2 + mk + k^3 = m^3 -3m^2k + 3mk^2 - k^3$$, which (after dividing by the non-zero $k$) simplifies to $2k^2 + (m^2-3m)k + (m+3m^2) = 0.$ The discriminant of that quadratic in $k$ is $(m^2-3m)^2 - 8(m+3m^2)$, and that has to be a square, say $n^2$. So $$n^2 = (m^2-3m)^2 - 8(m+3m^2) = m^4 - 6m^3 - 15m^2 - 8m = m(m-8)(m+1)^2$$ and therefore $m(m-8) = (m-4)^2 - 16$ must also be a square. The only way that can happen is if $m-4 = \pm5$. Thus $m = 9$ or $-1$. If $m=9$ then the quadratic for $k$ has solutions $k= -21$ and $k=-6$. If $m=-1$ then the only solution for $k$ is $k=-1$.

That gives three possible solutions, $(m,k) = (9,-21),\ (9,-6),\ (-1,-1)$.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
therefore $m(m-8) = (m-4)^2 - 16$ must also be a square. The only way that can happen is if $m-4 = \pm5$.

Why is that?
 
I like Serena said:
Opalg said:
therefore $m(m-8) = (m-4)^2 - 16$ must also be a square. The only way that can happen is if $m-4 = \pm5$.
Why is that?
If $x^2-16 = y^2$ then $16 = x^2-y^2 = (x+y)(x-y)$. The only factorisation of $16$ giving positive integer values for $x$ and $y$ is $x+y=8$, $x-y=2$, so that $x=5$ and $y=3$.
 
Thank you so much for participating, Opalg! And welcome back to the forum as well!:) But Opalg, I am sorry to tell you that you missed another solution set, which is $(m, k)=(8, -10)$.

My solution:
By expanding and simplifying the given equation, we get

$$m^3+m^2k^2+mk+k^3=m^3-3m^2k+3mk^2-k^3$$

$$2k^3+(m^2-3m)k^2+mk+3m^2k=0$$

Since $k \ne 0$, divide through the equation above by $k$, we have

$$2k^2+(m^2-3m)k+m+3m^2=0$$

and solve for $k$ using the quadratic formula yields

$$k=\frac{-(m^2-3m) \pm \sqrt{(m^2-3m)^2-4(2)(m+3m^2)}}{2(2)}$$

$$\;\;\;=\frac{3m-m^2 \pm \sqrt{(m+1)^2(m(m-8))}}{4}$$

$$\;\;\;=\frac{3m-m^2 \pm (m+1)\sqrt{m(m-8)}}{4}$$

Recall that the expression inside the radical must be greater than or equal to zero, thus, $$m(m-8)\ge 0$$ and this gives

$m\le 0$ and $m \ge 8$.

Also, bear in mind that we're told $m, k$ are both integer values, so, $m(m-8)$ has to be a squre.

But if we apply the AM-GM inequality to the terms $m$ and $m-8$, we find

$$\frac{m+m-8}{2} \ge \sqrt{m(m-8)}$$

$$m-4 \ge \sqrt{m(m-8)}$$

$m\ge 8$ implies $m-4 \ge 4$ and this further implies $\sqrt{m(m-8)} \le 4$ and now, we will solve for $m$ by considering $\sqrt{m(m-8)}=0$ or $1$ or $2$ or $3$or $4$ and we will take whichever solution that gives the integer values of $m$.

$$\sqrt{m(m-8)}= 4$$ gives irrational $m$ values.

$$\sqrt{m(m-8)}= 3$$ gives $m=-1, 9$.

$$\sqrt{m(m-8)}= 2$$ gives irrational $m$ values.

$$\sqrt{m(m-8)}= 1$$ gives irrational $m$ values.

$$\sqrt{m(m-8)}= 0$$ gives irrational $m=0, 8$ values but $m>0$, hence $m=8$.

Thus, by substituting each of the value of $m$ to the equation (*) above to find for its corresponding $k$ value, we end up with the following 4 solution sets, namely

$(m, k)=(-1, -1), (8, -10), (9, -6), (9, -21)$
 
I like Serena said:
Opalg said:
therefore $m(m-8) = (m-4)^2 - 16$ must also be a square. The only way that can happen is if $m-4 = \pm5$.
Why is that?
Oops, I should have taken I like Serena's query more seriously. I was thinking that the only way you could have $x^2-16 = y^2$ was in the situation $5^2 - 4^2 = 3^2$. But in the solution to this problem, the situation $4^2 - 4^2 = 0^2$ is also possible. That leads to the solution $m=8$ and $k=-10$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top