Find Angular Velocity for Moving Particle Parallel to x-Axis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity of a particle moving parallel to the x-axis with a constant y-component of its position vector equal to 'b'. The correct formula for angular velocity, derived from the position vector's angle with respect to the origin, is ω = bv/(b² + x²). Participants debated the validity of different approaches to the problem, specifically the method of resolving the velocity into radial and tangential components. The final consensus emphasizes that the tangential component of velocity influences the change in angle, confirming the derived formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with differentiation and trigonometric functions
  • Knowledge of position vectors in Cartesian coordinates
  • Basic principles of motion in physics, particularly in two dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular velocity in polar coordinates
  • Learn about the relationship between tangential and radial components of motion
  • Explore the application of trigonometric identities in physics problems
  • Investigate the implications of constant velocity in two-dimensional motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and motion analysis, as well as educators looking for detailed explanations of angular velocity concepts.

Vatsal Goyal
Messages
51
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A particle is moving parallel to x-axis in the positive direction with velocity v such that at all the instants the y -axis component of its position vector is constant and is equal to 'b'. Find angular velocity about origin.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that angular velocity would be the rate of change of the angle of the position vector of the particle with the origin, let's say theta. So I wrote tan (theta) = b/x and differentiated with time but got the wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems to me your general approach is correct, so either you did a mistake in the differentiation or on the afterwards algebraic manipulation that is needed in order to find the angular velocity.

Please post your work with as much detail as you can so we ll be able to pinpoint your mistakes.
 
Vatsal Goyal said:
got the wrong answer.
perhaps it is a matter of whether you take the angle as from the x-axis or from the y axis.
 
The answer I got myself, taking the angle from the x-axis is ω=bv/(b2+x2). replace x=vt to get it as a function of time t. Is that the answer from your book, or is that what you calculated?
 
Delta² said:
The answer I got myself, taking the angle from the x-axis is ω=bv/(b2+x2). replace x=vt to get it as a function of time t. Is that the answer from your book, or is that what you calculated?
Thats what I am getting, but the answer is different in the book, I checked the solutions and what they had done is that they took component of velocity perpendicular to position vector and then differentiated, I have a feeling that its wrong because that's not what my teacher taught, what do you think?
IMG_20180804_085914.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180804_085914.jpg
    IMG_20180804_085914.jpg
    62.4 KB · Views: 374
haruspex said:
perhaps it is a matter of whether you take the angle as from the x-axis or from the y axis.
No the book had a diagram, and angle is clearly marked with horizontal, similar to the one I have drawn in the post above.
 
I think the two approaches should give same result. Can you give us what is the final answer from your book?
 
Delta² said:
I think the two approaches should give same result. Can you give us what is the final answer from your book?
Its [v sin^2(theta)]/b
 
Vatsal Goyal said:
Its [v sin^2(theta)]/b
are you quite sure that is different? Note that you were not given x, so you should eliminate that from your answer.
 
  • #10
It is the same as we calculated, it is easy to see that ##\sin^2(\theta(t))=\frac{b^2}{b^2+x(t)^2}##
 
  • #11
Ohh I didn't see that, thank you! But how do I justify the book's approach, I don't understand why their answer is correct. They have divided the magnitude of component of velocity perpendicular to position vector by the magnitude of position vector.
 
  • #12
Vatsal Goyal said:
Ohh I didn't see that, thank you! But how do I justify the book's approach, I don't understand why their answer is correct. They have divided the magnitude of component of velocity perpendicular to position vector by the magnitude of position vector.
If you resolve the motion vector into radial and tangential components relative to the origin then only the tangential component causes the angle to change. vtangential=rradialω.
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
822
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
959
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K