MHB Find Car B's Initial Velocity: A Physics Puzzle

AI Thread Summary
Car A travels north at 12 m/s and collides with Car B, which is traveling east, resulting in both cars moving together at an angle of 40.1° north of east. The problem uses conservation of momentum to determine Car B's initial velocity. By equating the momentum before and after the collision, two equations are derived, leading to the calculation of Car B's velocity. The final result indicates that Car B's initial velocity is approximately 14.25 m/s. This physics puzzle effectively illustrates the application of momentum conservation in a collision scenario.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Every one, Two cars approach an extremely icy four-way perpendicular intersection. Car A travels northward at 12 m/s and car B is traveling eastward. They collide and stick together, traveling at 40.1° north of east. What was the initial velocity of car B (in m/s)? (Enter the magnitude. Assume the masses of the cars are equal.)

Work:

Given:
$$u_1=12 m/s$$
$$Car A= <0,1> North $$
$$Car B=<1,0> East $$

$$y: m_a*u_1+m_a*v_1=(m_a+m_b)*v_f*cos (40.1 degrees)$$
$$x:m_b*u=(m_a+m_b)*v_f*sin (40.1 degrees)$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What we want to do is apply conservation of momentum ("extremely icy" is our cue to neglect any friction as negligible). Let's orient our coordinate axes such that north points in the positive $y$ direction and east points in the positive $x$ direction.

Momentum of car A:

$$m\cdot\vec{v_A}=m\langle 0,12 \rangle$$

Momentum of car B:

$$m\cdot\vec{v_B}=m\langle v_B,0 \rangle$$

And so by addition, we find the total momentum of the two cars before the impact to be:

$$m\langle v_B,12 \rangle$$

Now, the momentum of the two cars stuck together after the impact is given by:

$$2mv_f\langle \cos\left(40.1^{\circ}\right),\sin\left(40.1^{\circ}\right) \rangle$$

Equate the components of the initial and final momenta, and what system results?
 
As a followup, we obtain the two equations (after dividing out $m$):

$$v_B=2v_f\cos\left(40.1^{\circ}\right)$$

$$12=2v_f\sin\left(40.1^{\circ}\right)\implies 2v_f=\frac{12}{\sin\left(40.1^{\circ}\right)}$$

Substituting for $2v_f$ into the first equation, there results:

$$v_B=12\cot\left(40.1^{\circ}\right)\approx14.25$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top