Find di/dt and dr/dt for a DC circuit with indepedent current source

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a practice problem related to a DC circuit with an independent current source. Participants are specifically focused on finding the derivatives of current and voltage at the moment just after a switch is closed (t=0+), particularly diL(0+)/dt, dvC(0+)/dt, and dvR(0+)/dt. The scope includes theoretical analysis and application of circuit laws.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that before t=0, the circuit behaves differently due to the absence of the current source, leading to specific initial conditions for the inductor and capacitor.
  • Another participant points out that the inductor cannot change its current abruptly, suggesting that diL(0+)/dt should be 0 since the inductor current remains constant at -6A just after t=0.
  • A further inquiry is made regarding the resistor, questioning whether the current through it is 0 at t=0+ and how that affects dvR(0+)/dt.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the ideal current source on the voltage across the capacitor and the resulting rate of change of voltage across the resistor, referencing a book's answer that states dvR(0+)/dt is 0.
  • There is acknowledgment of the need for assumptions regarding the behavior of the circuit elements, particularly in relation to the problem statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of the resistor and the implications of the ideal current source. While some agree on the inductor's current derivative being 0, the discussion on the resistor's behavior remains unresolved, with no consensus on the assumptions necessary for the analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of assumptions regarding circuit behavior, particularly in the context of ideal components and their influence on voltage and current derivatives. The problem statement's lack of clarity on certain assumptions is noted as a potential limitation in the discussion.

Xhendos
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
For the circuit in Fig. 8.7, find: (a) i L (0 + ), v C (0 + ), v R (0 + ),
(b) di L (0 + )∕dt, dv C (0 + )∕dt, dv R (0 + )∕dt, (c) i L (∞), v C (∞), v R (∞).
Relevant Equations
I = C dv/dt
V = L di/dt
Dear PF,

I am trying to solve practice problem 8.2. I am stuggling with part B of the question which asks us to find diL(0+)/dt, dvC(0+)/dt and dvR(0+)/dt.
2021-01-23-123306_909x406_scrot.png
My attempt can be seen below. Before t=0 the 4A current source is not present and thus it is an open circuit. A capacitor acts as an open circuit to DC and an inductor acts as a short circuit to steady-state DC conditions and thus that is why schematic for part A of the question looks like that. Using this schematic I find that iL = -6A and both vC and vR are 0V. This matches the answer of the book.

However, for part B of the question, I did manage to find dv/dt by using KCL at node A and B and using the fact that the inductor cannot change its current abruptly, so for t = 0+ the inductor current is still -6A.
WhatsApp Image 2021-01-23 at 12.19.37.jpeg


However, I am not quite sure how I can find di/dt and dr/dt. Can anyone give me a little hint here? I am stuck on this for quite a while.
 

Attachments

  • 2021-01-23-110406_898x341_scrot.png
    2021-01-23-110406_898x341_scrot.png
    11.9 KB · Views: 377
Physics news on Phys.org
Xhendos said:
the inductor cannot change its current abruptly, so for t = 0+ the inductor current is still -6A.
so what does that say about the (initial) ##\displaystyle {di_L\over dt} ## ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xhendos
BvU said:
so what does that say about the (initial) ##\displaystyle {di_L\over dt} ## ?
Right! Since the current iL does not change between interval 0- and 0+ the derivative at that point in time is 0! You are right. How about the resistor? Can we proof that current iR is 0 such that there is no potential voltage across the resistor its derivative and no current flows at t=0+ through the resistor?
 
Xhendos said:
there is no potential voltage across the resistor its derivative and no current flows at t=0+ through the resistor?
You found ##V_R(0^+)## in part (a). For the current the capacitor can swallow at ##t=0^+## there is (only theoretically) no limit: the current source is supposedly ideal and pumps in 4A, thereby determining ##\displaystyle {{dV_C\over dt} \left (0^+\right )}## according to what you said yourself:
Xhendos said:
1611442195524.png
The righthand side of the circuit doesn't interfere with this (the inductor does not like sudden changes in current).

But now comes the hard bit: ## \displaystyle {{dV_R\over dt}\left (0^+\right )}##.
Charles' book answer is 0. What do you think :smile: ?

Xhendos said:
1611443745557.png
This assumption is indeed necessary.
But, different from 8.1, I don't see it in the problem statement :rolleyes:...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
681
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K