Find Distance on a 2-Sphere Using Metric Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Okay, say you're given two points on a sphere, using the metric tensor how do you find the distance between the two points? (along the geodesic connecting them)

By the way, I know how to do it with just plain old vectors in R^3, but I'd like try doing it with the metric tensor.

Thanks,

Kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you have the equation of the geodesic, it's fairly easy. Let's suppose the coordinates are x1 and x2, probably lattitude and longitude. Suppose our geodesic is a curve that has coordinates \mbox{x^1(\lambda)} , \mbox{x^2(\lambda)} i.e
these two functions are the paramaterized geodesic. You can think of \mbox{\lambda} as being a time parameter if you envision an object actually moving along the geodesic. Then to get the distance, you just have to integrate


<br /> \int_{lambda} d \lambda \sqrt{\Sigma_{ij} (g_{ij} {(\frac{d x^i}{d \lambda})(\frac{d x^j}{d \lambda}) )} <br />


where \mbox{\lambda} varies from the starting point of the geodesic to the ending point

Expanding out the sum over i,j in the square root for expositional purposes, we write
<br /> \int_{lambda} d \lambda \sqrt{g_{11} (\frac{dx^1}{d\lambda})^2 + 2 g_{12} \frac{dx^1}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^2} {d\lambda} + g_{22} (\frac{dx^2}{d\lambda})^2}<br />

If you don't have the equation for the geodesic, you have to solve the differential equations for geodesic motion

<br /> \frac{d^2 x^u}{d \lambda^2} + \Gamma^u{}_{ab}(\frac{dx^a}{d \lambda})(\frac{dx^b}{d \lambda})<br />
 
well the geodesic is going to be part of a great circle so I should probably just try to parameterize it...Thanks, I'll try it out.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top