Find Distance on a 2-Sphere Using Metric Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter homology
  • Start date Start date
homology
Messages
305
Reaction score
1
Okay, say you're given two points on a sphere, using the metric tensor how do you find the distance between the two points? (along the geodesic connecting them)

By the way, I know how to do it with just plain old vectors in R^3, but I'd like try doing it with the metric tensor.

Thanks,

Kevin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you have the equation of the geodesic, it's fairly easy. Let's suppose the coordinates are x1 and x2, probably lattitude and longitude. Suppose our geodesic is a curve that has coordinates \mbox{x^1(\lambda)} , \mbox{x^2(\lambda)} i.e
these two functions are the paramaterized geodesic. You can think of \mbox{\lambda} as being a time parameter if you envision an object actually moving along the geodesic. Then to get the distance, you just have to integrate


<br /> \int_{lambda} d \lambda \sqrt{\Sigma_{ij} (g_{ij} {(\frac{d x^i}{d \lambda})(\frac{d x^j}{d \lambda}) )} <br />


where \mbox{\lambda} varies from the starting point of the geodesic to the ending point

Expanding out the sum over i,j in the square root for expositional purposes, we write
<br /> \int_{lambda} d \lambda \sqrt{g_{11} (\frac{dx^1}{d\lambda})^2 + 2 g_{12} \frac{dx^1}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^2} {d\lambda} + g_{22} (\frac{dx^2}{d\lambda})^2}<br />

If you don't have the equation for the geodesic, you have to solve the differential equations for geodesic motion

<br /> \frac{d^2 x^u}{d \lambda^2} + \Gamma^u{}_{ab}(\frac{dx^a}{d \lambda})(\frac{dx^b}{d \lambda})<br />
 
well the geodesic is going to be part of a great circle so I should probably just try to parameterize it...Thanks, I'll try it out.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top