Find force on a particle at time t

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force on a particle at time t using principles of work and power. Participants derive the relationship between force, momentum, and work, ultimately arriving at the equation F = sqrt(2mk/t). They clarify that while power remains constant, force and acceleration are time-dependent. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly expressing work in terms of momentum and mass, leading to the conclusion that F = mk/p is a valid expression for force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of work and power in physics
  • Knowledge of momentum and its relation to mass and velocity
  • Basic calculus for differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of work-energy principles in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in dynamic systems
  • Explore the concept of time-dependent forces and their implications in physics
  • Investigate advanced topics in momentum conservation and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of force calculations and energy principles.

Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
A particle of mass ##m## is driven by a machine that delivers a constant power of k watt. If the particle starts from rest, the force on the particle at time t is...................
Relevant Equations
##\vec F=m\frac{d^2 \vec s}{dt^2}##
##P=\frac{W}{t}##
##W=\vec F\cdot \vec s##
Screenshot (110).png


My attempt :

##\frac{\vec Ft^2}{2}=m\vec s##
##s=\frac{Ft^2}{2m}##
##P=\frac{W}{t}##
##k=\frac{\vec F\cdot \vec s}{t}##
##k=\frac{F^2t^2}{2mt}##
##k=\frac{F^2t}{2m}##
##F=\sqrt{\frac{2mk}{t}}##

But there was an option which was ##2\sqrt{\frac{mk}{t}}##. And my assumption was that it was correct. They approximately equal but not completely. Do you get the same answer? Or do you get ##2## outside the square root?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you assumed acceleration is constantfor your first equation?
 
PeroK said:
Have you assumed acceleration is constant for your first equation?
Yes
 
But it isn't !
You want to start from ##W = P t\ ##
And use ##F = {dp\over dt} ##
 
Istiakshovon said:
Yes
The power is constant; not the force. Hence the acceleration is time dependent.
 
BvU said:
But it isn't !
You want to start from ##W = P t\ ##
And use ##F = {dp\over dt} ##
##W=Pt##
##Fs=Pt##
##\frac{kt}{s}=\frac{dp}{dt}##
🤔
 
:smile: Excellent. What is ##W## in terms of ##p ## and ##m## ?
Remember, you don't want ##s##. You want ##{dp\over dt}##
 
BvU said:
:smile: Excellent. What is ##W## in terms of ##p ## and ##m## ?
Remember, you don't want ##s##. You want ##{dp\over dt}##
If I take ##p## then I don't get ##m## cause I must use ##p=mv## to find out ##W## in terms of ##m##. I can write that ##W=\frac{dp}{dt}vdt##, but I don't want to use velocity also.
 
You sure don't. But ##W = kt## and you can write ##W## in terms of ##p## and ##m##, I should hope :wink:

[edit] ##W=\frac{dp}{dt}vdt## says ## W={\rm d}p\,v \ ##, that can't be right !

##\ ##
 
  • #10
BvU said:
You sure don't. But ##W = kt## and you can write ##W## in terms of ##p## and ##m##, I should hope :wink:

[edit] ##W=\frac{dp}{dt}vdt## says ## W={\rm d}p}\,v ## can't be right !

##\ ##
Oops I remember, ##W=\frac{p^2}{2m}##..
 
  • #11
Good. So now you want ##{\rm d}p\over dt## out of ##W = kt## and bingo !

##\ ##
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Istiak
  • #12
##W=kt##
##\frac{p^2}{2m}=kt##
##p^2=2mkt##
##\frac{d(p^2)}{dt}=2mk##
##2p\dot p=2mk##
##F=\frac{mk}{p}##
blah :|

Instead of doing that I found ##p=\sqrt{2mkt}##
##F=\frac{1}{2}(2mkt)^{-\frac{1}{2}}2mk##
##=\sqrt{\frac{mk}{2t}}##

Done! Thanks. but sad :)
 
  • #13
Istiakshovon said:
Done! Thanks. but sad :)
Nonsense. Well done! Do you think others just do this kind of thing 'on the fly'? Not me and not many others either.

Sorry @PeroK for somewhat intruding.

##\ ##
 
  • #14
You could also have used ##Fv = P = k## and ##\frac 1 2 m v^2 = Pt = kt##.

In general we have:
$$E = \frac 1 2 m \vec v \cdot \vec v$$$$\Rightarrow \ P \equiv \frac{dE}{dt} = m \vec a \cdot \vec v = \vec F \cdot \vec v$$
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Istiak

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K