Find if a function is bounded through its Laplace transform

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the boundedness of a function f(t) based on its Laplace transform F(s) given by the expression F(s) = (s + 1) / (s² + as + 1), where the parameter a influences the nature of the roots of the denominator. Participants explore how the values of a affect the behavior of f(t), particularly in terms of boundedness and oscillation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss computing the roots of the denominator and the implications of these roots on the inverse transform. There are attempts to understand the conditions under which the roots are real, distinct, or complex, and how these conditions relate to the boundedness of the function f(t).

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the nature of the roots based on the value of a, with some suggesting the use of partial fractions for the inverse transform. There is an ongoing exploration of how different cases affect the boundedness and oscillatory behavior of f(t), but no consensus has been reached on a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the parameter a, particularly its range and how it influences the behavior of the function. There is mention of specific conditions such as a < 0 leading to unboundedness, and the oscillatory behavior for -2 < a < 2, which are under discussion but not resolved.

libelec
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f(t) transforms into F(s), so that [tex]\[<br /> F(s) = \frac{{s + 1}}{{s^2 + as + 1}},a \in <br /> \][/tex], prove that if a < 0, the function f(t) isn't bounded, and if a >= 0, it is bounded. Prove that if -2 < a < 2, f(t) oscilates.


The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly have no idea how to do this. I think I have to use the final value property, but that gives me that f(t) has a finite limit when t approaches to infinity wheather a is positive or not (actually, if a is 0, it gives me that f(t) diverges).

Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by computing the roots of the denominator (as a function of a). What is the inverse transform for each of the cases?
 
The roots are terrible to look at:

[tex]\[<br /> s^2 + as + 1 = \left( {s + \frac{{a - \sqrt {a^2 - 4} }}{2}} \right)\left( {s + \frac{{a + \sqrt {a^2 - 4} }}{2}} \right)<br /> \][/tex].

Then I find that [tex]\[<br /> F(s) = \frac{{s + 1}}{{s^2 + as + 1}} = \frac{{s + 1}}{{\left( {s + \frac{{a - \sqrt {a^2 - 4} }}{2}} \right)\left( {s + \frac{{a + \sqrt {a^2 - 4} }}{2}} \right)}}<br /> \][/tex].

I find no way to anti-transform this.
 
For what values of a are the roots real and distinct? A double real root? Complex conjugates?
 
If a2 > 4, then those are real roots. Otherwise, complex and conjugate (since a [tex]\in[/tex]R). If a = 2, then the roots are double (1). Still, no way to find the anti-transform.
 
Well, if [tex]a^2>4\Leftrightarrow a>2 \vee a<-2[/tex]. These are distinct real roots, say [tex]\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\beta[/tex], which means that you can factor
[tex] <br /> F(s) = \frac{{s + 1}}{{s^2 + as + 1}}<br /> [/tex]

As:

[tex] <br /> F(s) = \frac{A}{{s-\alpha}}+\frac{B}{{s-\beta}}<br /> [/tex]

Where A and B are constants. How do you invert that? What's the behaviour of the inverses?
 
Oh, right, partial fractions, I forgot about them. Well the, I will get to exponential functions, A.e-ax, where a>0, A is a constant, and those are bounded functions. If the roots where negative, then the exponentials would be of the form A.eax, which are not bounded.

And if the roots are complex, then I would get sines or cosines, right?

Thanks.
 
Exactly. For 0<a<2 (complex conjungate roots, with negative real part), you have sines and cosines (oscillatory behaviour); for a>=2, you have negative real roots. Therefore, in both cases, the inverse will go to 0, as t goes to infinity (bounded functions).

If -2<a<=0, you will have oscillatory behaviour (complex roots again, with nonnegative real parts), which means sines and cosines again; if a<=-2, then you will have real roots, but at least one of them will be positive, so the inverse is unbounded.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K