Find inverse hyperbolic function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of the hyperbolic sine function, specifically computing f-1(0) where f(t) = sinh(t). Participants are exploring the mathematical properties and manipulations involved in this process.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various algebraic manipulations, including taking logarithms and rearranging terms to isolate variables. There are attempts to derive a quadratic equation from the original function and questions about the validity of certain steps in the process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants providing guidance on techniques and questioning the assumptions made during the problem-solving process. There is recognition of different approaches to isolating variables and the implications of the solutions derived.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the manipulation of variables and the implications of taking logarithms, indicating a need for clarification on the relationships between the variables involved.

synergix
Messages
177
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find f-1(t) and compute f-1(0) where
f(t) = sinh(t)

Homework Equations


sinh(t)=( et- e-t)/2

The Attempt at a Solution



t= (ey- e-y)/2

ln2t = y - - y

y = (ln2t)/2

but wikipedia says
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/e/d/8edd21edb4cd413e462fe82ef4ac249b.png"

what silly mistake have i made this time?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i would check the step where you take the logarithm

ony way that may work, would be to let y = f(t), x=e^t then try and solve for x(y) first
 
y = (et- e-t)/2
2y = et- e-t
2yet = e2t - 1 (multiply both sides by et)

Let x = et, then you have a quadratic equation to help you isolate the t.
 
yes! this is how my instructor showed me but we have covered soo much this past couple of weeks I completely forgot about that technique. Thanks!
 
I used z instead of x and I got to
z^2-2tz-1=0
z= t+- sqrt(t^2+1)
z = e^y

so ln both sides

how do i know whether it is positive or negative?

since i can see from the formulas on wikipedia I went ahead with the rest and f-1(0) = ln1 = 0
 
Last edited:
so is [itex]t-\sqrt{t^2+1}[/itex] greater or less than zero? is this for all t? consider what happens when you take the logarithm, and which is actually a solution to the orginal equation

also, I find the way you swap y & t is quite confusing
you start with:
[itex]y(t) = sinh(t)[/itex]

so if I was you, I would solve for t(y)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K