Find Magnitude of Vector a: Solve Ax2 + Ay2 + Az2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gattz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the magnitude of a vector represented in three-dimensional space, specifically the vector a = axi + ayj + azk. Participants are exploring the mathematical expression for the magnitude and clarifying the role of each component in the context of vector representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for the magnitude of a vector, questioning the inclusion of the az component. There is an exploration of how to represent the components mathematically, including the use of superscripts and subscripts.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the dimensionality of vectors and the implications for calculating magnitude. There is an acknowledgment of the need to include all three components in the magnitude calculation, and some participants are considering geometric interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the challenge of representing mathematical expressions correctly in the forum format, which may affect clarity. There is also a reference to using Pythagorean theorem concepts to understand the relationship between the dimensions of the vector.

Gattz
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If you are given vector a = axi + ayj + azk and you want to find the magnitude of a, then would you just do the square root of ax2 + ay2? If so, then what about az? What is azk actually? I'm a little unclear about it being related to a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would do the square root of ax2 + ay2 + ay2.
Sorry, I don't know how to make superscripts. Too bad they don't copy.
 
You mean az for the last one?

And to do superscripts, just put "[.SUP] [/SUP.]" without the quotations and periods (caps don't matter). And it's for subscripts.
 
Yes az, and thanks for the tip.
 
Just a quick explanation for that azk term, if you still are unclear about it.

k adds another dimension to the vector. When a vector is only in i,j it's 2D and i,j,k is 3D. See it as drawing it in a xyz-coordinate system instead of a xy one. And as was mentioned earlier, it changes things a little bit when it comes to the magnitude. You wouldn't just do the √(ax2 + ay2), because then you wouldn't take the third dimension into consideration. From there it's not too big of a leap to √(ax2 + ay2 + az2).

You can prove it using Pythagoras' theroem. If you draw a 3D vector in a coordinate system you can figure it out. It can be a bit tricky to see, but it's not impossible.
 
You could do it that way and you'll get the same answer.
It would be interesting to prove that . . .
 
Actually I just realized that the square root of az2 + ay2 is the hypothesis. So I guess it makes sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K