Find Max Speed for Smaller Mass in Trebuchet w/ Stiff Rod & 2 Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter semc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trebuchet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum speed of a smaller mass (0.12 kg) in a trebuchet system with a stiff rod of 3 meters and a larger mass (60 kg) positioned 0.14 meters from the pivot. The initial potential energy is set to zero, and the equations used include energy conservation principles. The larger mass does not stop at the bottom but continues to oscillate, affecting the kinetic energy distribution between the two masses. The correct approach involves analyzing energy transfer rather than assuming the larger mass stops moving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically energy conservation
  • Familiarity with angular velocity and its relationship to linear velocity
  • Knowledge of potential and kinetic energy equations
  • Basic grasp of oscillatory motion in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study energy conservation in mechanical systems, focusing on potential and kinetic energy transformations
  • Learn about angular momentum and its application in rotating systems
  • Explore the dynamics of oscillatory motion and damping effects
  • Investigate the relationship between tangential speeds of connected masses in a pulley or lever system
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and hobbyists interested in trebuchet mechanics and energy transfer in dynamic systems.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Imagine a trebuchet with a stiff rod of 3m and neligible mass.Two masses 60kg and 0.12kg are at its end with the bigger mass 0.14m away from the pivot point. Find the maximum speed the smaller mass attain.

Actually i posted this before but it seems i can't get the answer provided in the book. So what i did was to assume the initial position of the masses to be at 0 potential so initially they have no energy. Then i consider the case when the rod is vertical which gives me the equation - MgL+ [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]Mv12 - mg(0.14) = 0. In this case i assume the bigger mass to stop moving when it reaches the bottom. Am i allowed to make this assumption? If not how do i calculate for the velocity of the bigger mass?

Since the smaller mass is significantly smaller than the bigger mass, i use mg(0.14) - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv22=0 to estimate the velocity of the bigger mass and find the angular velocity from there. I use v=r[tex]\omega[/tex] to calculate the velocity of the smaller mass however the answer i got was way too smaller compared to the answer why is this so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semc said:
Imagine a trebuchet with a stiff rod of 3m and neligible mass.Two masses 60kg and 0.12kg are at its end with the bigger mass 0.14m away from the pivot point. Find the maximum speed the smaller mass attain.

Actually i posted this before but it seems i can't get the answer provided in the book. So what i did was to assume the initial position of the masses to be at 0 potential so initially they have no energy. Then i consider the case when the rod is vertical which gives me the equation - MgL+ [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]Mv12 - mg(0.14) = 0. In this case i assume the bigger mass to stop moving when it reaches the bottom. Am i allowed to make this assumption? If not how do i calculate for the velocity of the bigger mass?

Since the smaller mass is significantly smaller than the bigger mass, i use mg(0.14) - [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv22=0 to estimate the velocity of the bigger mass and find the angular velocity from there. I use v=r[tex]\omega[/tex] to calculate the velocity of the smaller mass however the answer i got was way too smaller compared to the answer why is this so?
You are not taking the correct approach. You have to analyse the problem from the point of view of energy.

The energy of the falling large mass does three things. The loss of potential energy of the large mass gives the large mass kinetic energy; it gives the smaller mass kinetic energy; and it does something else that uses energy. (hint: What happens to the potential energy of the small mass as the large mass falls?). The large mass does not stop when it reaches the bottom. It oscillates until it gradually stops.

When you determine how much energy is kinetic energy, you can determine the speeds. What is the relationship between the tangential speeds of the masses?

AM
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K