Find Net Electric Field Between Two Point Charges

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field between two point charges, q1 and q2, using the formula E(X) = k[(q1/x^2) - (q2/(d+x)^2)]. There is confusion regarding the signs and distances in the equation, particularly when evaluating E(-0.100), which indicates a point to the left of q1. Clarifications reveal that the correct approach involves using (d-x)^2 for q2 and adjusting the signs based on the position relative to the charges. The correct equations for different regions along the x-axis are established, leading to a better understanding of when to add or subtract the contributions from each charge. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately applying the principles of electric fields in different spatial contexts.
rlc
Messages
128
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In the figure, two point charges q1 = 3.40×10-5 C and q2 = 1.70×10-4 C are separated by a distance d = 0.10 m. Compute their net electric field E (x) as a function of x for the following positive and negative values of x, taking E to be positive when the vector E points to the right and negative when E points to the left. Plot your values in your notebook.
What is E(-0.100)?

upload_2015-1-16_10-33-43.png


Homework Equations


E(X)=k[(q1/x^2)-(q2/(d+x)^2)]

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the above equation, but the answer was wrong. When E(-0.100), does that mean the x in the equation is also negative? I get the feeling I've messed up some of the signs.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two things wrong with you relevant equation.
  1. If you want the magnitude of the field due to a charge, you need the distance to that charge. That is correct for q1 in your equation, but not for q2
  2. The minus sign in your equation is only valid in 0 < x < d because there the field from q1 points to the right (positive x direction) and from q2 to the left.
 
When it says E(-0.100), does that mean the x value of -0.100, as in a point on the x-axis to the left of q1? (-0.100, 0)

For your first point, are you saying that it should be (d-x)^2?
Second point, that the two fractions should instead be added?
E(X)=k[(q1/x^2)+(q2/(d-x)^2)]
 
When it says E(-0.100), does that mean the x value of -0.100, as in a point on the x-axis to the left of q1? (-0.100, 0) -- Yes

For your first point, are you saying that it should be (d-x)^2? -- Yes. Better: (x-d)2

Second point, that the two fractions should instead be added? --- Yes/No:

To the right of a charge q/x2 points to the right
To the left of a charge q/x2 points to the left​

To get it in one expression, we often use this notation : ##\vec E(\vec r) = k\; q\; {\displaystyle \vec r\over |\vec r|^3}##

q itself also has a sign. In this exercise both q1 and q2 are positive. So

x< 0 both point to the left => add and put a minus sign in front
0<x<d q1 to the right, q2 to the left (as in your original relevant equation E(X)=k[(q1/x2) - (q2/(d-x)2)] )
d<x both point to the right => add (so indeed E(X)=k[(q1/x2) + (q2/(d-x)2)] )​

Make a drawing !
 
  • Like
Likes rlc
E(x<0)=-k[(q1/x^2) + (q2/(d-x)^2)]
E(0<x<d)=k[(q1/x^2) - (q2/(d-x)^2)]
E(d<x)=k[(q1/x^2) + (q2/(d-x)^2)]

These equations all worked! Thank you so much for explaining it all to me, I think I actually understand now why you would subtract vs. add!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
951
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
700
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K