Find Nth Derivative of Square Root of X

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a general formula for the nth derivative of the function \(x^{1/2}\) (the square root of x). Participants are exploring the patterns in the derivatives and attempting to express them in a generalized form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive a general formula based on the derivatives they have calculated for the first few values of n. They are questioning the patterns in the numerators and denominators of the derivatives, particularly regarding the products of odd integers and the powers of x.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different expressions and substitutions to find a correct general formula. Some participants have suggested using factorials and products of odd integers, while others are checking their assumptions and results against previously calculated derivatives. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive directions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit their approaches. There is also a noted confusion regarding the starting values of the sequences they are trying to derive, particularly how to align their formulas with the derivatives they have computed.

  • #31
indeed :wink:

so can you explain why it works? (take a look at the bottom of the post where I suggested it)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ok so for my final answer:

[(-1)^(n+1)(2n-2)!]/[(2^n)(n-1)!(2^(n-1))]*X^(.5-n)
 
  • #33
Data's expression is the same as HallsofIvy's.
 
  • #34
Data said:
indeed :wink:

so can you explain why it works? (take a look at the bottom of the post where I suggested it)

still trying to understand it. i don't know what halls is though.
 
  • #35
yes, it's the same except that you can still evaluate it for n= -1 (even though the "product of the first 0 odd integers" doesn't make any sense). It happens to give dnt exactly what he needs though.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
0rthodontist said:
Data's expression is the same as HallsofIvy's.

your right...why didnt it work the first time i tried it? :confused:

dont know what i did. i think i substituted wrong or something.
 
  • #37
Halls is HallsofIvy
 
  • #38
lol. i was thinking halls was some calc theorem :)
 
  • #39
occasionally an apparently useless thing (like, say, multiplying by 1, which is all I did) can allow you to avoid splitting things up into ugly "special cases"
 
  • #40
Data said:
yes, it's the same except that you can still evaluate it for n= -1 (even though the "product of the first 0 odd integers" doesn't make any sense). It happens to give dnt exactly what he needs though~
Ah, good idea.
I do think it would have been easier to generalize from example (continuing from before, at the fourth derivative):
(-1)^3 \frac{6!}{(3!)(2^7)} \cdot x^{-\frac{7}{2}}
Now you know that you're going to change the sign every time, so the exponent on -1 is going to increase by 1 every time. The 6! came from 5 * 3 * 1 so that is going to increase by 2 every time. The 3! will increase by 1 every time, and the exponent on the 2 will increase by 1 every time from 5 * 3 * 1 and by another 1 every time from the denominator. So you can then write
(-1)^{n - 1} \frac{(2 * (n - 1))!}{((n-1)!)2^{2n - 1}} \cdot x^{\frac{1}{2} - n}
where all I did was make sure the various terms increase as they should, and otherwise adjust them by constants so they match the example. This saves you some fiddling with off-by-one errors and then you can verify it with more general notation.
 
Last edited:
  • #41
HallsofIvy said:
Also, your statement that "the numerator part goes 1,-1,-3,-5" is wrong.

What you put in your very first post was:
n=1 (1st der): (1/2)(x^-1/2) = (1/2)(x^(-1/2))
n=2 (2nd der): (1/2)(-1/2)(x^-3/2) = (-1/4)(x^(-3/2))
n=3 (3rd der): (1/2)(-1/2)(-3/2)(x^-5/2) = (+3/8)(x^(-5/2))
n=4 (4th der): (1/2)(-1/2)(-3/2)(-5/2)(x^-7/2) = (-15/16)(x^(-7/2))
(I've added the last in each line.)
so the numerators are 1, -1, 3= 1*3, -15= -1*3*15.

It might help you to realize this:

A product of even integers is 2*4*6*...*2n= (2*1)(2*2)(2*3)...(2*n)= (2*2*2...2)(1*2*3*...n)= 2nn!.

A product of odd integer, 1*3*5*7*...*(2n+1) is missing the even integers: multiply and divide by them:
\frac{1*2*3*4*5*...*(2n)*(2n+1)}{2*4*6*...*(2n)}= \frac{(2n+1)!}{2^n(n!)}


i konw the problem has been solved but i wanted to make sure i really understood it and one more question about the above equation popped into my head.

in regards to that numerator (product of the first n integers) how does it equal (2n+1)! ?

eg. if n=5 (product of first 5 integers = 1*2*3*4*5), well that should be equal to 120 which is n!

if you use (2n+1)! you get 11!, a much bigger number. can someone reexplain that? thanks.
 
  • #42
dnt said:
i konw the problem has been solved but i wanted to make sure i really understood it and one more question about the above equation popped into my head.

in regards to that numerator (product of the first n integers) how does it equal (2n+1)! ?

eg. if n=5 (product of first 5 integers = 1*2*3*4*5), well that should be equal to 120 which is n!

if you use (2n+1)! you get 11!, a much bigger number. can someone reexplain that? thanks.

can anyone explain it?
thanks.
 
  • #43
dnt said:
in regards to that numerator (product of the first n integers) how does it equal (2n+1)! ?

it doesn't. (2n+1)! is the product of the first 2n+1 integers, of course, not the first n integers.

But (2n+1)!/(n!2^n) is the product of the first n+1 odd integers, because you're multiplying together the first 2n+1 integers and then dividing out the even ones. Here n!2^n is the product of the first n even integers:

n!2^n = n(n-1)...(1)*2^n = (2n)(2n-2)...(2).

So in (2n+1)!/(n!2^n), you're multiplying together the first 2n+1 integers in the top, then you divide out the first n even integers in the bottom, leaving you with the first (2n+1)-n = n+1 odd integers!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K