Find Nucleus Radius: Mass vs. Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter niamh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Radius
niamh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How do I find the radius of the nucleus if given the mass? I am asked to compare it with the value found using the formula R= 1.2 A^(1/3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have to take into assumption some stuff...
For example you'll have to assume that the nuclei have constant density...
and you'll have to assume that their shape is given (to be spherical)...
 
Measured values for the radii of select nuclei are available from the IAEA.
 
That's what I was thinking using the relation mass=volume x density, but if I don't know the density how can I use this relation?
 
I think all formulas are basically another way to calculate R= 1.2 A^(1/3) . Sure, you can replace A by the mass divided by the (average) mass of a nucleon, and get a formula like R= const* (mass/density)^(1/3), but that is nothing new.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top