Find Polynomial of Degree <2 to Satisfy (1, p), (2, q), (3, r)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Polynomial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a polynomial of degree less than 2 that passes through three specified points (1, p), (2, q), and (3, r), where p, q, and r are arbitrary constants. Participants explore the implications of the degree of the polynomial and whether such a polynomial can exist for all values of p, q, and r.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a polynomial of the form f(t) = a + bt + ct² and sets up a system of equations based on the points (1, p), (2, q), and (3, r).
  • Another participant argues that a polynomial of degree less than 2 is linear and can only satisfy two of the three conditions, suggesting that it cannot exist for all values of p, q, and r.
  • A participant mentions that for the specific case of (p, q, r) = (0, 0, 0), the resulting polynomial is a zero polynomial, which is considered to have an undefined or negative degree, thus satisfying the condition of being less than 2.
  • Confusion arises regarding the thread title and the initial post, with one participant pointing out a discrepancy between the title and the content.
  • Another participant identifies a potential error in the matrix manipulation presented in the original post, suggesting that it could lead to incorrect conclusions.
  • A later reply clarifies that the polynomial should actually have a degree greater than or equal to 2, and provides a corrected derivation that includes a squared term.
  • Participants discuss specific values for p, q, and r, and verify that the polynomial derived works for those values, but express uncertainty about whether such a polynomial can exist for all arbitrary values of p, q, and r.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on whether a polynomial of degree less than 2 can satisfy the conditions for all values of p, q, and r. There are competing views regarding the degree of the polynomial required and the implications of the derived equations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made about the degree of the polynomial and the specific values of p, q, and r. The discussion includes potential errors in mathematical derivations that have not been fully resolved.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0
Find a polynomial of degree < 2 [a polynomial of the form [itex]f\left(t\right)\,=\,a\,+\,bt\,+\,ct^2[/itex]] whose graph goes through the points (1, p), (2, q), (3, r), where p, q, r are arbitrary constants. Does such a polynomial exist for all values of p, q, r?


Here is what I have so far:

(1, p) ==> [itex]p\,=\,a\,+\,b\,+\,c[/itex]
(2, q) ==> [itex]q\,=\,a\,+\,2b\,+\,4c[/itex]
(3, r) ==> [itex]r\,=\,a\,+\,3b\,+\,9c[/itex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 1 & 2 & 4 & q \\<br /> 1 & 3 & 9 & r<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_2\,=\,R_2\,-\,R_1[/tex]
[tex]R_3\,=\,R_3\,-\,R_1[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 2 & 8 & r - p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_3\,=\,R_3\,-\,2R_2[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 2 & r - q<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_3\,=\frac{1}{2}\,R_3[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2}\left(r - q\right)<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_2\,=\,R_2\,-\,3R_3[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 & \frac{5}{2}\,q\,-\,p\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2}\left(r - q\right)<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_1\,=\,R_1\,-\,R_2\,-\,R_3[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & 2p\,-\,2q\,+\,r \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{2}\left(5q\,-\,2p\,-\,3r\right) \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2}\left(r - q\right)<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]a\,=\,2p\,-\,2q\,+\,r[/tex]
[tex]b\,=\,\frac{1}{2}\,\left(5q\,-\,2p\,-\,3r\right)[/tex]
[tex]c\,=\,\frac{1}{2}\,\left(r\,-\,q\right)[/tex]


[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\,a\,+\,bt\,+\,ct^2[/tex]
[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\,\left(2p\,-\,2q\,+\,r\right)\,+\,\left[\frac{1}{2}\,\left(5q\,-\,2p\,-\,3r\right)\right]\,t\,+\,\left[\frac{1}{2}\,\left(r\,-\,q\right)\right]\,t^2[/tex]
[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\frac{1}{2}\,r\,t^2\,-\,\frac{1}{2}\,q\,t^2\,+\,\frac{5}{2}\,q\,t\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r\,t\,-\,p\,t\,+\,2\,p\,+\,r\,-\,2\,q[/tex]

But when I try a set of arbitrary numbers [(1, 8), (2, 12), (3, 3)], I get an equation that does not match the points:

[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\,-\frac{9}{2}\,t^2\,+\,\frac{35}{2}\,t\,-\,5[/tex]

[tex]f\left(1\right)\,=\,-\frac{9}{2}\,(1)^2\,+\,\frac{35}{2}\,(1)\,-\,5\,=\,8[/tex]

[tex]f\left(2\right)\,=\,-\frac{9}{2}\,(2)^2\,+\,\frac{35}{2}\,(2)\,-\,5\,=\,12[/tex]

[tex]f\left(3\right)\,=\,-\frac{9}{2}\,(3)^2\,+\,\frac{35}{2}\,(3)\,-\,5\,=\,7[/tex]

However, [itex]f\left(3\right)[/itex] should be equal to r, which is 3, not 7.

Please help:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
VinnyCee said:
Find a polynomial of degree < 2 [a polynomial of the form ] whose graph goes through the points (1, p), (2, q), (3, r), where p, q, r are arbitrary constants. Does such a polynomial exist for all values of p, q, r?
Of degree < 2? Then it is linear, of the form y= mx+ b and you can only determine only the two numberss m and b. In general 2 equations will do that. You can choose m and b so that 2 of the requirements (1, p), (2, q), (3, r) are satisfied but not all 3.
 
For (p, q, r) = (0, 0, 0) we have (a, b, c) = (0, 0, 0), and therefore a zero polynomial, which has a degree undefined or [tex]-\infty[/tex], so it's less than 2. :biggrin:
 
The title says "Find a >2 degree polynomial" and the post itself says
"Find a polynomial of degree < 2".

Is it any wonder I'm confused!
 
VinnyCee said:
[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 2 & 8 & r - p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_3\,=\,R_3\,-\,2R_2[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 2 & r - q<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

Confusion about <2 vs >2 aside, your derivation has an error in the quoted section. You substract [itex]2 R_2[/itex] from [itex]R_3[/itex], but in the augmented part of the matrix you've only subtracted [itex]1 R_2[/itex], resulting in r - q instead of r + p - 2q. I didn't check to see if everything else was correct, but this is certainly a place to start with.
 
Sorry for the confusion!

The polynomial needs to have a degree of GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 2.

So it needs to have at least one squared term.

Here is the corrected derivation with help from Mute (Thanks!):

(1, p) ==> [itex]p\,=\,a\,+\,b\,+\,c[/itex]
(2, q) ==> [itex]q\,=\,a\,+\,2b\,+\,4c[/itex]
(3, r) ==> [itex]r\,=\,a\,+\,3b\,+\,9c[/itex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 1 & 2 & 4 & q \\<br /> 1 & 3 & 9 & r<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_2\,=\,R_2\,-\,R_1[/tex]
[tex]R_3\,=\,R_3\,-\,R_1[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 2 & 8 & r - p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_3\,=\,R_3\,-\,2R_2[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 2 & r - 2q + p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_3\,=\frac{1}{2}\,R_3[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 3 & q - p \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2} r - q + \frac{1}{2} p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_2\,=\,R_2\,-\,3R_3[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & p \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 & -\frac{5}{2}\,p\,+\,4\,q\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2} r - q + \frac{1}{2} p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]R_1\,=\,R_1\,-\,R_2\,-\,R_3[/tex]

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & 3\,p\,-\,3\,q\,+\,r \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 & -\frac{5}{2}\,p\,+\,4\,q\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2} r - q + \frac{1}{2} p<br /> \end{array} \right]<br /> \end{displaymath}[/tex]

[tex]a\,=\,3\,p\,-\,3\,q\,+\,r[/tex]
[tex]b\,=\,-\frac{5}{2}\,p\,+\,4\,q\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r[/tex]
[tex]c\,=\,\frac{1}{2} r - q + \frac{1}{2} p[/tex]


[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\,a\,+\,bt\,+\,ct^2[/tex]
[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\,\left(3\,p\,-\,3\,q\,+\,r\right)\,+\,\left[-\frac{5}{2}\,p\,+\,4\,q\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r\right]\,t\,+\,\left[\frac{1}{2} r - q + \frac{1}{2} p\right]\,t^2[/tex]
[tex]f\left(t\right)\,=\frac{1}{2}\,r\,t^2\,+\,\frac{1}{2}\,p\,t^2\,-\,q\,t^2\,+\,4\,q\,t\,-\,\frac{5}{2}\,p\,t\,-\,\frac{3}{2}\,r\,t\,+\,3\,p\,+\,r\,-\,3\,q[/tex]

[tex]p\,=\,8[/tex]
[tex]q\,=\,12[/tex]
[tex]r\,=\,3[/tex]

So now it works for these numbers!

[tex]f\,(\,t\,)\,=\,-\frac{13}{2}\,t^2\,+\,\frac{47}{2}\,t\,-\,9[/tex]

[tex]f\,(\,1\,)\,=\,-\frac{13}{2}\,(\,1\,)^2\,+\,\frac{47}{2}\,(\,1\,)\,-\,9\,=\,8[/tex]
[tex]f\,(\,2\,)\,=\,-\frac{13}{2}\,(\,2\,)^2\,+\,\frac{47}{2}\,(\,2\,)\,-\,9\,=\,12[/tex]
[tex]f\,(\,3\,)\,=\,-\frac{13}{2}\,(\,3\,)^2\,+\,\frac{47}{2}\,(\,3\,)\,-\,9\,=\,3[/tex]

But how can I figure (or prove) whether or not a polynomial exists for all values of p, q, and r? There does exist such a polynomial for all p, q, and r right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K