Find Projectile Flight Time Given Only Maximum Height

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving projectile motion problems, specifically determining flight time using only maximum height. Participants note that while it seems possible to calculate flight time without horizontal displacement, various angles and velocities can yield the same maximum height with differing flight times. A key insight is to analyze the vertical component of motion, treating the projectile as an object in free fall to derive the flight time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding different frames of reference, which can clarify the relationship between horizontal velocity and flight time. Ultimately, recognizing the vertical motion simplifies the problem-solving approach.
trryan5
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A projectile reaches a maximum height of 14.5 meters and travels a horizontal distance of 52.6 meters. How long was it in the air?
Relevant Equations
Vfy = V0y - 9.8t
I've been trying some online projectile problems. Specifically, I was using this one on master difficulty, looking at row e. It uses a random number generator; I shared the data I received in the Homework Statement above.

According to the help section, you can solve this with the formula given, but I don't see how. In fact, they seem to suggest that you don't even need the horizontal displacement, and can figure out the flight time of a projectile with just its maximum height, but there are lots of combinations of angles and velocity that will produce the same maximum height with different flight times.

I sort of cheated my way into a solution using this calculator. Note the calculator can't solve for time with just the two pieces of data given. What I did was put in horizontal distance (and initial height of 0) and start guessing at times until I found that 3.44 seconds produces a height of 14.5 meters.

Can anyone explain to me the correct approach to solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trryan5 said:
In fact, they seem to suggest that you don't even need the horizontal displacement, and can figure out the flight time of a projectile with just its maximum height,
That is correct.
trryan5 said:
but there are lots of combinations of angles and velocity that will produce the same maximum height with different flight times.
Why do you think this?

Hint: Analyze just the vertical component of the motion. You can play with the kinematic formulas until you can solve it.

Hint2: For an object dropped from that height, how long would it take to fall?
 
trryan5 said:
... figure out the flight time of a projectile with just its maximum height, but there are lots of combinations of angles and velocity that will produce the same maximum height with different flight times.
Consider these three baseball throws:
1654194693973.png


Knowing nothing else, at a guess, do you expect the three of them to have different flight times?

What if I told you they were not three baseball throws, but only one, just viewed from different locations on the field? What would you say about flight time now?
 

Attachments

  • 1654194476041.png
    1654194476041.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 193
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes gmax137 and phinds
Doc Al said:
That is correct.

Why do you think this?

Hint: Analyze just the vertical component of the motion. You can play with the kinematic formulas until you can solve it.

Hint2: For an object dropped from that height, how long would it take to fall?
Ah, now I feel foolish. I was so focused on not knowing the initial upward velocity that I didn't think about analyzing it as an object in free fall.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and DaveC426913
trryan5 said:
Ah, now I feel foolish. I was so focused on not knowing the initial upward velocity that I didn't think about analyzing it as an object in free fall.
You could also consider two frames of reference. One at rest relative to the ground. And the other moving with the horizontal velocity of the projectile. The time of flight is the same in both (as it must be), yet the horizontal velocity and displacemet are different in each.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, SammyS and Doc Al
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top