MHB Find Sum of Diagonals of Pentagon $PQRST$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the sum of the diagonals of a pentagon $PQRST$ inscribed in a circle, with given side lengths. A guess was made that the lengths of the diagonals $PR$, $QS$, and $RT$ are all equal to 12, which was later confirmed using the circumradius formula and Ptolemy's theorem. The lengths of the other diagonals $PS$ and $QT$ were found to be $\frac{27}{2}$ and $\frac{44}{3}$, respectively. The total sum of the diagonals was calculated as $\frac{385}{6}$, leading to the final answer of 391 when adding the numerator and denominator. The solution emphasizes the importance of verifying guesses through mathematical principles.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $PQRST$ be a pentagon inscribed in a circle such that $PQ=RS=3$, $QR=ST=10$, and $PT=14$. The sum of the lengths of all diagonals of $PQRST$ equals to $\dfrac{a}{b}$, where $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime positive integers.

Find $a+b$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]I started with a lucky guess. The diagonals $PR$, $QS$, $RT$ are all equal, because each of them is the longest side of an oblique-angled triangle whose other sides are $3$ and $10$, all three triangles having the same circumradius. The question suggests that the diagonals may all have rational length, and going by the look of the diagram I guessed that those three diagonals might all have length $12$. If so, then the circumradius can be calculated from the formula $$r = \frac{abc}{\sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}}$$ for the circumradius $r$ of a triangle with sides $a,b,c.$ That formula gave the radius of the circle as $\dfrac{72}{\sqrt{95}}.$ I then used the same circumradius formula (this time knowing the radius and two of the sides in order to find the third side) in the triangle $PQS$ to find that $PS = \frac{27}2$, and in the triangle $QST$ to find that $QT = \frac{44}3.$

Since those lengths are all rational, and all consistent with the circumradius being $\frac{72}{\sqrt{95}}$, it follows that my lucky guess was correct. The sum of the lengths of the five diagonals is $12 + 12 + 12 + \frac{27}2 + \frac{44}3 = \frac{385}6$. So the answer to the problem is $385 + 6 = 391.$[/sp]
 

Attachments

  • pentagon.png
    pentagon.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 120
Opalg said:
[sp]I started with a lucky guess. The diagonals $PR$, $QS$, $RT$ are all equal, because each of them is the longest side of an oblique-angled triangle whose other sides are $3$ and $10$, all three triangles having the same circumradius. The question suggests that the diagonals may all have rational length, and going by the look of the diagram I guessed that those three diagonals might all have length $12$. If so, then the circumradius can be calculated from the formula $$r = \frac{abc}{\sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}}$$ for the circumradius $r$ of a triangle with sides $a,b,c.$ That formula gave the radius of the circle as $\dfrac{72}{\sqrt{95}}.$ I then used the same circumradius formula (this time knowing the radius and two of the sides in order to find the third side) in the triangle $PQS$ to find that $PS = \frac{27}2$, and in the triangle $QST$ to find that $QT = \frac{44}3.$

Since those lengths are all rational, and all consistent with the circumradius being $\frac{72}{\sqrt{95}}$, it follows that my lucky guess was correct. The sum of the lengths of the five diagonals is $12 + 12 + 12 + \frac{27}2 + \frac{44}3 = \frac{385}6$. So the answer to the problem is $385 + 6 = 391.$[/sp]
you guessed PR=12
you have to prove:PR=12 first
 
Last edited:
By applying Ptolemy's theorem five times I got 5 equations:

$a^2=10c+9$

$a^2=3e+100$

$ce=14a+30$

$ae=3a+140$

$ac=10a+42$

I rerranged a little to get cubics in e-3 and c-10 which my calculator solved for me. :p
 
Opalg said:
[sp]I started with a lucky guess. The diagonals $PR$, $QS$, $RT$ are all equal, because each of them is the longest side of an oblique-angled triangle whose other sides are $3$ and $10$, all three triangles having the same circumradius. The question suggests that the diagonals may all have rational length, and going by the look of the diagram I guessed that those three diagonals might all have length $12$. If so, then the circumradius can be calculated from the formula $$r = \frac{abc}{\sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}}$$ for the circumradius $r$ of a triangle with sides $a,b,c.$ That formula gave the radius of the circle as $\dfrac{72}{\sqrt{95}}.$ I then used the same circumradius formula (this time knowing the radius and two of the sides in order to find the third side) in the triangle $PQS$ to find that $PS = \frac{27}2$, and in the triangle $QST$ to find that $QT = \frac{44}3.$

Since those lengths are all rational, and all consistent with the circumradius being $\frac{72}{\sqrt{95}}$, it follows that my lucky guess was correct. The sum of the lengths of the five diagonals is $12 + 12 + 12 + \frac{27}2 + \frac{44}3 = \frac{385}6$. So the answer to the problem is $385 + 6 = 391.$[/sp]

Good job, Opalg!(Happy)

You always be so capable to come up with an educated guess that it couldn't possibly go wrong and what's more important to me is, you will always confirm your hypothesis is correct. :):cool:

M R said:
By applying Ptolemy's theorem five times I got 5 equations:

$a^2=10c+9$

$a^2=3e+100$

$ce=14a+30$

$ae=3a+140$

$ac=10a+42$

I rerranged a little to get cubics in e-3 and c-10 which my calculator solved for me. :p

Well done, M R! :)

Yes, the trick for solving this problem is to to use the Ptolemy's theorem thrice and thanks for participating!

Here is the solution that I wanted to share with the folks at MHB, which is NOT my solution:
View attachment 2759

Note that $PQRS$ and $QRST$ are isoscles trapezoids so let $d=PR=QS=RT$, $e=PS$ and $f=QT$.

Then by Ptolemy's theorem on $PQRS,\,QRST,\,RSTP$, we have

$d^2=10e+9$

$d^2=3f+10$

$de=10d+42$

Now, solve the first for $e$ and substitute into the third to get:

$d\left(\dfrac{d^2-9}{10}\right)=10d+42$

This is equivalent to the cubic $d^3-109d-420=0$ which has roots 12, -5 and -7 so $d=12$.

Substituting this into the first and second equations gives $e=\dfrac{27}{2}$ and $f=\dfrac{44}{3}$ and thus the sum of all diagonals is $3d+e+f=\dfrac{385}{6}=\dfrac{a}{b}$ and hence $a+b=385+6=391$.
 

Attachments

  • find a+b.JPG
    find a+b.JPG
    21 KB · Views: 101
Albert said:
you guessed PR=12
you have to prove:PR=12 first
That is correct. Fortunately, the circumradius formula comes to the rescue again, to justify my "lucky guess".

[sp]Let $x = PR=RT = QS$. The triangles $PQR$ (with sides $3,10,x$) and $PRT$ (with sides $x,x,14$) have the same circumradius. So the circumradius formula says that $$\frac{30x}{\sqrt{(13^2-x^2)(x^2-7^2)}} = \frac{14x^2}{\sqrt{14^2(14^2 - x^2)}}.$$ After some cancellation and simplification, that reduces to $60 = x\sqrt{13^2-x^2}$. Square both sides and rearrange, to get $x^4 - 13x^2 + 60^2 = 0$. That factorises as $(x^2-12^2)(x^2-5^2) = 0$, with solutions $x = \pm5,\pm12.$ The only one of those that fits the geometric context is $x=12.$[/sp]
 

Attachments

  • pentagon.png
    pentagon.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 103
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top