Find the acceleration in terms of velocity and displacement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a raindrop as it falls, considering an increase in mass of 3 kg/m due to water accumulation. Participants agree that neglecting air resistance implies the acceleration should equal gravitational acceleration (g). However, concerns are raised regarding the realism of a 3 kg/m mass increase, suggesting it leads to impractical scenarios, such as a raindrop gaining 300 kg after falling 100 meters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of realistic parameters in physics problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic principles of kinematics
  • Concept of gravitational acceleration (g)
  • Familiarity with mass and its effects on motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the effects of air resistance on falling objects
  • Study the relationship between mass and acceleration in fluid dynamics
  • Investigate the concept of terminal velocity in falling objects
  • Learn about the variations of gravitational acceleration at different altitudes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the dynamics of falling objects and the effects of mass on acceleration.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Assume a raindrop falls from the clouds and the mass increases as it falls and the increase in mass is 3kg/m. Neglecting any frictional force, find the acceleration in terms of velocity and displacement. Initially when t=0 assume mass is negligible.

I just want to ask if we were to neglect drag or air resist, shouldn't the acceleration be g?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It increases in mass by colliding with water (in some form) that isn't moving. That will slow it down. Is the increase 3kg/m?:confused: That doesn't make sense at all. You'd think it would depend on the size of the raindrop, and that the effect would be 10^4 to10^5 times smaller.
 


semc said:
Assume a raindrop falls from the clouds and the mass increases as it falls and the increase in mass is 3kg/m. Neglecting any frictional force, find the acceleration in terms of velocity and displacement. Initially when t=0 assume mass is negligible.

I just want to ask if we were to neglect drag or air resist, shouldn't the acceleration be g?

Yes, I would think so. Could this be a trick question to test your understanding? if so, I think you understand it :)

If we really wanted to go overboard we could calculate the value of g for different altitudes, but it should be relatively negligible.

Just a quick reality check, is the increase in mass of 3kg/m reasonable? If it fell 100m, it would gain 300kg, that's a pretty heavy raindrop.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K